Private benefits and public costs: Policies to address suburban sprawl

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 96-114

  Wiewel, Wim ^a   Persky, Joseph ^a   Sendzik, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL; SUBURBANIZATION; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032837505     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01956.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abbott, C., Howe, D., & Adler, S. (1994). Afterward. In C. Abbott, D. Howe, & S. Adler (Eds.), Planning the Oregon way: A twenty-year evaluation (pp. 205-219). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
2. Altshuler, A., & Gomez-Ibanez, J. (1994, January). The price of exactions. Governing, p. 65.
3. Angell, C., & Shorter, C. A. (1988, October). Impact fees: Private-sector participation in infrastructure financing. Government Finance Review, 4 (5), 19-21.
4. Ashworth, S. (1996). Harnessing land and development values for public benefit. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
5. Baker, K., Hinze, S., & Manzi, N. (1991). Minnesota's fiscal disparities program. St. Paul. MN: Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department.
6. Bames, W. R., & Ledebur, L. C. (1994). The U.S. common market of local economic regions. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
7. Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
8. Chernick, H., & Reschovsky, A. (1994). Urban fiscal problems: Coordinating actions among governments. Evanston, IL: Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University.
9. Chicago Department of Public Works. (1990). Access to jobs. Chicago, IL: Chicago Department of Public Works.
10. Cisneros, H. G. (1995). Regionalism: The new geography of opportunity. Washington, DC: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
11. Deakin, E. (1989). Growth controls and growth management: A summary and review of empirical research. In D. J. Brower, D. R. Godschalk, & D. R. Porter (Eds.), Understanding growth management: Critical issues and a research agenda (pp. 3-21). Washington, DC: The Urban Land Institute.
12. Dowall, D. (1984). The suburban squeeze. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13. Fischel, W. A. (1997). Comment on Carl Abbott's "The Portland region: Where city and suburbs talk to each other - and often agree." Housing Policy Debate, 5(1), 65-73.
14. Fischer, P. B. (1993). Comments. In L. B. Joseph (Ed.), Affordable housing and public policy: Strategies for metropolitan Chicago (pp. 259-262). Chicago, IL: Center for Urban Research and Policy Studies, The University of Chicago.
15. Foster, K. A. (1997). The political economy of special-purpose government. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Gleeson, M. E. (1979). The effects of an urban growth management system on land values. Land Economics, 55(3), pp. 350-365.
17. Hill, E., Wolman, H., & Ford, C. C. (1995). Can suburbs survive without their central cities? Examining the suburban dependence hypothesis. Urban Affairs Review 37(2), 147-174.
18. Hughes, M. A., & Stemberg, J. E. (1992). The new metropolitan reality: Where the rubber meets the road in antipoverty policy. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
19. Jargowsky, P. A. (1997). Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. Kelly, E. D. (1993). Managing community growth: Policies, techniques, and impacts. Westport, CT: Praeger.
21. Ladd, H. F., & Yinger, J. (1991). America's ailing cities: Fiscal health and the design of urban policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
22. Lang, R. E., & Homburg, S. P. (1997). Planning Portland style: Pitfalls and possibilities. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 1-10.
23. Lemann, N. (1994, January 9). The myth of community development. The New York Times, p. 27.
24. Liu, N. (1995). Urban highway congestion: An economic analysis of second-best congestion pricing schemes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
25. Martin, J. (1995, October 27). Statement at the metropolis project fall seminar. Cantigny, IL.
26. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the American underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Mattoon, R. (1995, November/December). Can alternative forms of governance help metropolitan areas? Economic Perspectives, 19(6), 20-32.
28. Metropolitan Planning Council. (1995). Creating a regional community: The case for cooperation. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
29. National Congress for Community Economic Development. (1989). Against all odds: The achievements of community-based development organizations. Washington, DC: National Congress for Community Economic Development.
30. Nelson, A. C., Nicholas, J. C., & Jurgensmeyer, J. C. (1990, May). Critical elements of development impact-fee programs. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 116(1), 34-47.
31. Orfield, M. (1995). Chicago metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Mimeo. Chicago, IL: J. D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
32. Orfield, M. (1997). Metropolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings.
33. Persky, J., Sclar, E., & Wiewel, W. (1992). Does America need cities?: An urban investment strategy for national prosperity. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Mayors and Economic Policy Institute.
34. Persky, J., & Wiewel, W. (1998). When cities lose jobs: The costs and benefits of metropolitan employment deconcentration. Chicago, IL: Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago.
35. Porter, D. R. (1988, Winter). Will developers pay to play? Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(1), 59-64.
36. Porter, D. R. (1997). Managing growth in America's communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
37. Quercia, R. G., & Galster, G. C. (1997). Threshold effects and the expected benefits of attracting middle-income households to the central city. Housing Policy Debate, 8(2), 409-436.
38. Rosenbaum, J. E. (1993). Closing the gap: Does residential integration improve the employment and education of low-income Blacks? In L. B. Joseph (Ed.), Affordable housing and public policy: Strategies for metropolitan Chicago (pp. 223-257). Chicago, IL: Center for Urban Research and Policy Studies, The University of Chicago.
39. Rosentraub, M. S., & Nunn, S. (1994). City and suburb: Linkages, benefits, and shared responsibilities. Indianapolis, IN: Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indiana University.
40. Rosentraub, M. S., Nunn, S., Klacik, D., Przybylski, M., & Rubleske. J. (1996). Building the economic future of metropolitan Indianapolis: A proposal for regional cooperation and finance. Indianapolis, IN: Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indiana University.
41. Ross, D. H., & Thorpe, S. I. (1992, September). Impact fees: Practical guide for calculation and implementation. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 118(3), 106-118.
42. Rusk, D. (1993). Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
43. Savitch, H. V. (1993). The ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs, and the new metropolitan region. Economic Development Quarterly, 7(4), 341-357.
44. Siegel, W., & Mason, M. (1995). The power to shape the future: An analysis of decision making in the regional transportation planning process and impacts on the urban poor. Chicago, IL: Chicago Institute on Urban Poverty and Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Human Rights.
45. Singell, L. D., & Lillydahl, J. H. (1990, February). An empirical examination of the effect of impact fees on the housing market. Land Economics, 66 (1 ), 82-92.
46. Small, K. A.. Winston, C., & Evans, C. A. (1989). Road work: A new highway pricing and investment policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
47. Stroud, N. (1988, Winter). Legal considerations of development impact fees. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(1), 29-37.
48. Swindell, D. W., & Parks, R. (1995). Neighborhoods and unigov. In W. H. Hudnut, III (Ed.), The Hudnut years in Indianapolis, 1976-1991 (pp. 153-163). Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.
49. Tindale, S. A. (1991, May). Impact fees-issues, concepts, and approaches. ITE Journal, 61(5), 33-39.
50. Turner, M. A. (1997). Achieving a new urban diversity: What have we learned? Housing Policy Debate, 8(2), 295-306.
51. Vidal, A. (1992). Rebuilding communities: A national study of urban community development corporations. New York, NY: Community Development Research Center, New School for Social Research.
52. Vogel, R. K. (1997). Metropolitan government. In R. K. Vogel (Ed.), Handbook of research on urban politics and policy in the United States (pp. 185-196). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
53. Voith, R. (1992, September/October). City and suburban growth: Substitutes or complements. Business Review, p. 21.
54. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55. Wilson, W. J. (1997). When work disappears. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56. Wolman, H., Ford, C. C., III, & Hill, E. (1994). Evaluating the success of urban success stories. Urban Studies, 31 (6), 835-850.