Scientific expertise and public policy: Resolving paradoxes?

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 146-150

  Rutgers, M R ^a   Mentzel, M A ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0032836165     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154399781782509     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. G W Böhme (1978), "Autonomisierung und Finalisierung", in Starnberger Studien I: die gesellschaftliche Orientierung des wissenschafthichen Fortschritts (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main) pages 69-118.
2. G Böhme, W van den Daele, R Hohlfeld, W Krohn, W Schäfer and T Spengler (1978), "Einleitung", Starnberger Studien 1: Die gesellschaftliche Orientierung des wissenschaftlichen Fortschritts (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Mein) pages 7-22.
3. B C Denny (1965), "Science and public policy: a literature in search of a field". Public Administration Review. 25, pages 239-248.
4. A W Gouldner (1973), "Anti-minotaur: the myth of a value-free sociology", in For Sociology Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today (Allen Lane, London, article originally published 1962) pages 3-26.
5. K R Popper (1962), The Open Society and its Enemies (Routledge, London, 4th edition).
6. E Shills (1976), "Legitimating the social sciences: meeting the challenges to objectivity and integrity", in C Frankel (editor), Controversies and Decisions - The Social Sciences and Public Policy (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pages 273-290.
7. D Stone, A Denham and M Garnett (editors) (1998), Think Tanks across Nations, a comparative approach (Manchester University Press, Manchester/New York).
8. M Weber (1982), Politik als Beruf (Duncker and Humblot, Berlin, 7th edition).
9. C H Weiss (1979), "The many meanings of research utilization", Public Administration Review, 39 pages 426-431.