Applying geostatistics to quantify distributions of large woody debris in streams

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 801-807

  Wing, Michael G ^a   Keim, Richard F ^a   Skaugset, Arne E ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

GIS; Nearest neighbor analysis; Semi variogram; Spatial statistics

Indexed keywords

GEOSTATISTICS; STREAMFLOW; WOODY DEBRIS;

EID: 0032832735     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00016-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abbe T.B., Montgomery D.R. Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers. 12:(2/3):1996;201-221.
2. Anderson N.H., Sedell J.R., Roberts L.M., Triska F.J. The role of aquatic invertebrates in processing of wood debris in coniferous forest streams. The American Midland Naturalist. 100:(1):1978;64-82.
3. Beschta R.L. Debris removal and its effects on sedimentation in an Oregon Coast Range stream. Northwest Science. 53:(1):1979;71-77.
4. Beschta R.L., Platts W.S. Morphological features of small streams: significance and function. Water Resources Bulletin. 22:(3):1987;369-379.
5. Bilby R.E., Ward J.W. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size streams in western Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 118:1989;368-378.
6. Bisson P.A., Bilby R.E., Bryant M.D., Dolloff C.A., Grette G.B., House R.A., Murphy M.L., Kosky K.V., Sedell J.R. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific northwest: past, present and future. Salo E.O., Cundy T.W. Streamside Management: Forestry and Fisheries Interactions. 1987;143 University of Washington Institute of Forest Resources, Seattle, Washington.
7. Braudrick C.A., Grant G.E., Ishikawa Y., Ikeda H. Dynamics of wood transport in streams: a flume experiment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 22:(7):1997;669-683.
8. Clark P.J., Evans F.C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology. 35:1954;445-453.
9. Environmental Systems Research Institute, 1994. ARC Commands. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, p. 698.
10. Environmental Systems Research Institutem, 1995. Data Conversion and Regions. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, p. 344.
11. Environmental Systems Research Institute, 1996a. Using ArcView GIS. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, p. 350.
12. Environmental Systems Research Institute, 1996b. ArcView Spatial Analyst. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, p. 148.
13. Franklin, J.F., Dyrness, C.T., 1973. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-8. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon, p. 417.
14. Harmon M.E., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J., Sollins P., Gregory S.V., Lattin J.D., Anderson N.H., Cline S.P., Aumen N.G., Sedell J.R., Lienkaemper G.W., Cromack K. Jr, Cummins K.W. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research. 15:1986;133-302.
15. Journel, A.G., 1989. Fundamentals of Geostatistics in Five Lessons. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, p. 40.
16. Journel, A.G., Huijbregts, C., 1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, London, p. 600.
17. Keim, R.F., Skaugset, A.E., Bateman, D.S. Digital terrain modeling of small stream channels with a total-station theodolite. Advances in Water Resources (in press).
18. Kellogg L.D., Pilkerton S.J., Skaugset A.E. Harvesting for active riparian zone management and the effects on muliple forest resources. Environmentally Sensitive Forest Engineering, Proceedings of the Council on Forest Engineering 16th Annual Meeting, Savannah, GA. 1993;Council on Forest Engineering, Corvallis, Oregon.
19. Krebs, C.J., 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper & Row, New York, p. 654.
20. Legendre P., Fortin M-J. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio. 80:1989;107-138.
21. Lienkaemper G.W., Swanson F.J. Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 17:(2):1987;150-156.
22. Lisle T.E. Stabilization of a gravel channel by large streamside obstructions and bedrock bends Jacoby Creek, northwestern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 97:(8):1986;999-1011.
23. Mathsoft, 1996 (Version 1.0). S+SPATIALSTATS User's Manual. MathSoft, Seattle, Washington, p. 226.
24. Montgomery D.R., Buffington J.M., Smith R.D., Schmidt K.M., Pess G. Pool spacing in forest channels. Water Resources Research. 31:(4):1995;1097-1105.
25. Montgomery D.R., Buffington J.M. Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 109:(5):1997;596-611.
26. Nakamura F., Swanson F.J. Effects of coarse woody debris on morphology and sediment storage of a mountain stream system in western Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 18:(1):1993;43-61.
27. Nakamura F., Swanson F.J. Distribution of course woody debris in a mountain stream, western Cascade Range, Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 24:(12):1994;2395-2403.
28. Reeves G.H., Hall J.D., Roelofs T.D., Hickman T.L., Baker C.O. Rehabilitating and modifying stream habitats. American Fisheries Society Special Publication. 19:1991;519-557.
29. Strahler A.N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union. 38:(6):1957;913-920.
30. Wells, F.G., Peck, D.L., 1961. Geologic map of Oregon west of the 121st meridian. US Geological Survey Miscellaneaous Investigation Series, map I-325.