Cloning humans, cloning literature: Genetics and the imagination deficit

New Genetics and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 9-22

  Van Dijck, José ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CLONING; MASS MEDIUM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0032829291     PISSN: 14636778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14636779908656887     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Botting, F. (1991) Making Monstrous. Frankenstein, Criticism, Theory (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
2. Dillenseger, N. (1998) Will There ever be Another You? Representations of Cloning and Human Clones in Weekly Magazines, MA Thesis, University of Strasbourg, ESST-program.
3. Doyle, R. (1994) Vital language. In Cranor, C. (ed.) Are Genes Us? The Social Consequences of the New Genetics, pp. 52-68 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
4. Durant, J., Hansen, A. & Bauer, M. (1996) Public understanding of the new genetics. In Marteau, T. & Richards, M. (eds) The Troubled Helix. Social and Psychological Implications of the New Genetics, pp. 235-48 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5. Fogle, T. (1995) Information metaphors and the Human Genome Project, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 38(4), pp. 535-47.
6. Franklin, S. (1997) Dolly: a new form of transgenic breedwealth, Environmental Values, 6, pp. 427-37.
7. Freedman, N. (1973) Joshua, Son of None (London: Granada).
8. Gilbert, W. (1992) A vision of the grail. In Kevles, D. & Hood, L. (eds) The Code of Codes. Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
9. Haraway, D. (1989) Primate Visions. Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modem Science (New York: Routledge).
10. Hodgson, A. (1998) Undressing Dolly: A Clone's 12 Months Gestation Period in the UK Press, MA Thesis, University of Maastricht, ESST-program.
11. Hopkins, P.D. (1998) Bad copies. How popular media represent cloning as an ethical problem, Hastings Center Report, March/April, 6-13.
12. Keller, E.F. (1992) Nature, nurture and the Human Genome Project. In Kevles, D. & Hood, L. (eds) The Code of Codes. Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, pp. 281-99 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
13. Keller, E.F. (1994) Master molecules. In Cranor, C. (ed.) Are Genes Us? The Social Consequences of the New Geneticsi, pp. 88-98 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
14. Kolata, G. (1997) Clone: The Road to Dolly and the Path Ahead (New York: Penguin).
15. Levin, I. (1976) The Boys from Brazil (London: Pan).
16. Levine, G. & Knoepflmacher, U.C. (eds) (1979) The Endurance of Frankenstein (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
17. Rosner, M. & Johnson, T. (1995) Telling stories: metaphors of the Human Genome Project, Hypatia, 10(4), pp. 105-27.
18. Shelley, M. (1818) Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus (1992, New York: Penguin).
19. Squier, S. (1994) Babies in Bottles. Twentieth-century Visions of Reproductive Technology (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
20. Thomson, A. (1993) Virtual Girl (New York: Ace).
21. Turney, J. (1998) Frankenstein's Footsteps. Science, Genetics and Popular Culture (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
22. Van Dijck, J. (1998) ImagEnation. Popular Images of Genetics (New York: New York University Press).
23. Watson, J. (1968) The Double Helix (New York: Mentor).
24. Woolmark, J. (1994) Aliens and Others. Science Fiction, Feminism, and Postmodernism (Iowa City: Iowa University Press).