The influence of consequentially on perceptions of crime seriousness

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 265-271

  Casey, Sinéad ^a   O'Connell, Michael ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OFFENDER; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VARIANCE;

EID: 0032824821     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/135532599167897     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Chilton, R. & DeAmicis, J. (1975). Overcriminalization and the measurement of consensus. Sociology and Social Research, 59, 318-329.
2. Karniol, R. (1978). Children's use of intention cues in evaluating behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 76-85.
3. Rossi, P. & Henry, J. P. (1980). Seriousness: A measure for all purposes? In M. W. Klein & K. S. Teilmann (Eds), Handbook of criminal justice evaluation, pp. 489-505. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Warr, M. (1989). What is the perceived seriousness of crimes? Criminolog, 20, 185-204.