Positive predictive value of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in an administrative database

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 555-558

  Petersen, Laura A ^a,b,c,d   Wright, Steven ^a,b,c   Normand, Sharon Lise T ^a,b,c   Daley, Jennifer ^a,b,c  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Databases; DRG; Information systems; Medical records; Myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

AGED; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 0032824623     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.10198.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 1. Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1980. Publication (PHS) 80-1260:366-7.
2. 2. Laine C. Coming to grips with large databases. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:645-7.
3. 3. Roper WL, Winkenwerder W, Hackbarth GW, Krakauer H. Effectiveness in health care: an initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1197-1202.
4. 4. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald DJ. Toward electronic medical records that improve care. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:725-6.
5. 5. Lohr KN. Use of insurance claims data in measuring quality of care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6:262-71.
6. 6. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:243-50.
7. 7. Simborg DW. DRG creep: a new hospital-acquired disease. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:1602-4.
8. 8. Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbater LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus information systems: implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:844-50.
9. 9. Assaf AR, Lapane KL, McKenney JL, Carleton RA. Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:931-5.
10. 10. Roos LL, Roos NP, Cageorge SM, Nicol JP. How good are the data? Reliability of one health care data bank. Med Care. 1982;20:266-76.
11. 11. Iezzoni L. Using administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care: pitfalls and potential of ICD-9-CM. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6:272-81.
12. 12. Dans P. Looking for answers in all the wrong places. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119:855-6.
13. 13. Romano PS, Mark DH. Bias in the coding of hospital discharge data and its implications for quality assessment. Med Care. 1994; 32:81-90.
14. 14. Demlo LK, Campbell PM, Brown SS. Reliability of information abstracted from patient's medical records. Med Care. 1978;16: 995-1005.
15. 15. Fisher ES, Whaley FS, Krushat WM, et al. The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:243-8.
16. 10. Iezzoni LI, Burnside S, Sickles L, et al. Coding of acute myocardial infarction: clinical and policy implications. Ann Intern Med. 1988; 109:745-51.
17. 17. Schiff GD, Yaacoub AS. The diagnostic coding of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1988; 109:745-51. Letter.
18. 18. Daley J, Jeneks SF, Draper D, et al. Predicting hospital-associated mortality for Medicare patients: a method for patients with stroke, pneumonia, acute myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1988;260:3617-24.
19. 19. Kennedy GT, Stem MP, Crawford MH. Miscoding of hospital discharges as acute myocardial infarction: implications for surveillance programs aimed at elucidating trends in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:1000-2.
20. 20. Reznik RB, Goldstein GB, Ring I, Berry G. The determination of the incidence of acute myocardial infarction from hospital morbidity records. J Chronic Dis. 1984;9/10:733-42.
21. 21. Nova Scotia-Saskatchewan Cardiovascular Epidemiology Group. Estimation of the incidence of acute myocardial infarction using record linkage: a feasibility study in Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan. Can J Public Health. 1989;80:412-7.
22. 22. van Walraven C, Wang B, Ugnat AM, Naylor CD. False-positive coding for acute myocardial infarction on hospital discharge records: chart audit results from a tertiary centre. Call J Cardiol. 1990;6:383-6.
23. 23. Wright SM, Daley J, Peterson ED, Thibault GE. Outcome of acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs: does regionalization of health care work? Med Care. 1997;35:128-41.
24. 24. Jeneks SF. HCFA's Health Care Quality Improvement Program and the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:1858-62.
25. 25. Ellerbeck EF, Jencks SR, Randford MJ, et al. Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: report on a four state pilot of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA. 1995;273:1509-14.
26. 26. Hunter Young NL, Hamann C, Cagan M. Daley J, Thibault GE. Validity and reliability of coding in the Veterans Health Administration Patient Treatment File for veterans with acute myocardial infarctions. Abstract presented at the VA HSR&D annual meeting. April 1994.