Adaptation and evaluation of the WEEDSIM weed management model for Michigan

Weed Science

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 338-348

  Renner, Karen A ^a   Swinton, Scott M ^a   Kells, James J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic modeling; CHEAL; Expert systems; Integrated weed management; Weed control; Weed management model; Weed population dynamics; Weed seed bank; WEEDSIM

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; WEED CONTROL; YIELD;

MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES;

CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; GLYCINE MAX; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0032823499     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500091876     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bates, D. M. and D. G. Watts. 1988. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Application. New York: Wiley and Sons.
2. Berti, A. and G. Zanin. 1997. GENSTINF: a decision model for post-emergence-emergence weed management in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Crop Prot. 16:109-116.
3. Buhler, D. D. 1996. Development of alternative weed management strategies. J. Prod. Agric. 9:501-505.
4. Buhler, D. D., J. L. Gunsolus, and D. F. Ralston. 1992. Integrated weed management techniques reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agron. J. 84:973-978.
5. Buhler, D. D., R. P. King, S. M. Swinton, J. L. Gunsolus, and F. Forcella. 1996. Field evaluation of a bioeconomic model for weed management in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 44:915-923.
6. Buhler, D. D., R. P. King, S. M. Swinton, J. L. Gunsolus, and F. Forcella. 1997. Field evaluation of a bioeconomic model for weed management in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 45:158-165.
7. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
8. Crook, T. M. and K. A. Renner. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album competition and time of removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:358-364.
9. Dieleman, A., A. S. Hamill, S. F. Wiese, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Empirical models of pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:612-618.
10. Forcella, F. 1992. Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves. Weed Res. 32:29-38.
11. Forcella, F., R. P. King, S. M. Swinton, D. D. Buhler, and J. L. Gunsolus. 1996. Multi-year validation of a decision aid for integrated weed management in row crops. Weed Sci. 44:650-661.
12. Forcella, F., R. G. Wilson, J. Dekker, et al. 1997. Weed seed bank emergence across the corn belt. Weed Sci. 45:67-76.
13. Forcella, F., R. G. Wilson, K. A. Renner, J. Dekker, R. G. Harvey, D. A. Alm, D. D. Buhler, and J. A. Cardina. 1992. Weed seed banks of the U. S. corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 42:636-644.
14. Fuller, E., B. Lazarus, L. Carrigan, and G. Green. 1992. Minnesota Farm Machinery Economic Costs Estimates for 1990. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Cooperative Extension Service Publication AG-FO-2308-c.
15. Gross, K. A. and K. A. Renner. 1989. A new method for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Weed Sci. 37:836-839.
16. Keils, J. J. and J. R. Black. 1991. CORNHERB-Herbicide options program for weed control in corn: an integrated decision support computer program, Version 2.0. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station.
17. Kidder, D., B. Posner, and D. Miller. 1989. WEEDIR: weed control directory, Version 3.0. St. Paul, MN: Univetsity of Minnesota Extension Service AG-CS-2163.
18. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Wiese, and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Intetference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42:568-573.
19. Monks, C. D., D. C. Bridges, J. W. Woodruff, T. R. Murphy, and D. J. Berry. 1995. Expert system evaluation and implementation for soybean (Glycine max) weed management. Weed Technol. 9:535-540.
20. Mortensen, D. A. and H. D. Coble. 1991. Two approaches to weed control decision-aid software. Weed Technol. 5:445-452.
21. Nott, S. B., G. D. Schwab, J. D. Jones, J. H. Hilker, and L. O. Copeland. 1995. Crops and Livestock Budgets Estimates for Michigan. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State Univetsity Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Economics Report No. 581.
22. Renner, K. A. and J. R. Black. 1991. SOYHERB: a computer program for soybean herbicide decision making. Agron. J. 83:921-925.
23. Renner, K. A. and J. J. Woods. 1999. Influence of cultural practices on weed management in soybean (Glycine max). J. Prod. Agric. 12:48-53.
24. Swinton, S. M., D. D. Buhler, F. Forcella, J. L. Gunsolus, and R. P. King. 1994a. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci. 42:103-109.
25. Swinton, S. M. and R. P. King. 1994a. A bioeconomic model for weed management in corn and soybean. Agric. Syst. 44:313-345.
26. Swinton, S. M. and R. P. King. 1994b. The value of weed population information in a dynamic setting: the case of weed control. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 75:36-46.
27. Swinton, S. M., J. Sterns, K. Renner, and J. Kells. 1994b. Estimating weedcrop interference parameters for weed management models. East Lansing, MI: Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 538.
28. [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1991. U.S. average costs of production for major field crops. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 639.
29. [USDA] U.S. Department of Agticulture. 1993. Agricultural resources: inputs situation and outlook. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, Resources and Technology Division Report AR-29.
30. Wilkerson, G. G., S. A. Modena, and H. D. Coble. 1991. HERB: decision model for postemergence weed control in soybean. Agron. J. 83:413-417.
31. Woods, J. J. 1992. Reduced herbicide inputs for corn and soybean production. M.S. thesis. Michigan State Univetsity, East Lansing, MI. 90 p.