Altered cardiac histology following apical right ventricular pacing in patients with congenital atrioventricular block

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1372-1377

  Karpawich, Peter P ^a   Rabah, Raja ^a   Haas, Joel E ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative site pacing; Apical pacing; Biopsy; Congenital AV block; Pathology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CELL GROWTH; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART MUSCLE BIOPSY; HEART MUSCLE CELL; HEART MUSCLE FIBROSIS; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIPID STORAGE; MITOCHONDRION; SCLEROSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ENDOCARDIUM; HEART BLOCK; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MITOCHONDRIA, HEART; MYOCARDIUM; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, RIGHT;

EID: 0032822868     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00631.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 1. Wiggers CJ. The muscular reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli. Am J Physiol 1925; 73:346-378.
2. 2. Gilmore JP, Sarnoff SJ, Mitchell JH, et al. Synchrony of ventricular contraction: Observations comparing hemodynamic effects of atrial and ventricular pacing. Br Heart J 1963; 25:299-307.
3. 3. Lister JW, Klotz DH, Jomain SL, et al. Effects of pacemaker site on cardiac output and ventricular activation in dogs with complete heart block. Am J Cardiol 1964; 14:494-503.
4. 4. Prinzen FW, Augustijn CH, Arts T, et al. Redistribution of myocardial fiber strain and blood flow by asynchronous activation. Am J Physiol 1990; 259:H300-308.
5. 5. Raichlen JS, Campbell FW, Edie RN, et al. The effect of the site of placement of temporary epicardial pacemakers on ventricular function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation 1984; 70:I118-123.
6. 6. Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schuller H. Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sinus node disease: A treatment comparison study. Am Heart J 1986; 111:292-297.
7. 7. Burkoff D, Oikawa RY, Sagawa K. Influence of pacing site on canine left ventricular contraction. Am J Physiol 1986; 251:H428-435.
8. 8. Deal CW, Fielden P, Monk I. Hemodynamic effects of differing pacemaker site and demand pacemaking. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973; 66:454-457.
9. 9. Heydrickx GR, Vilaine JP, Knight DR, et al. Effects of altered site of electrical activation on myocardial performance during inotropic stimulation. Circulation 1985; 71:1010-1016.
10. 10. Burch GE. Of the conduction system and myocardial function. Am Heart J 1976; 92:809.
11. 11. Bedotto JB, Grayburn PA, Black WH, et al. Alterations in left ventricular relaxation during atrioventricular pacing in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15:658-663.
12. 12. Moak J, Barron K, Hougen T, et al. Congenital heart block: New observations. (abstract) PACE 1996; 19:613.
13. 13. Adomian GE, Beazell J, Myofibrillar disarray produced in normal hearts by chronic electrical pacing. Am Heart J 1986; 112:79-83.
14. 14. Karpawich PP, Justice CD, Cavit DL, et al. Developmental sequelae of fixed-rate, ventricular pacing in the immature canine heart: An electrophysiologic, hemodynamic and histopathologic evaluation. Am Heart J 1990; 119:1077-1083.
15. 15. Karpawich PP, Justice CD, Chang CH, et al. Septal ventricular pacing in the immature canine heart: A new perspective. Am Heart J 1991; 121:827-833.
16. 16. Lev M. The conduction system. In: SE Gould (ed.): Pathology of the Heart and Blood Vessels. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas Pub., 1968, pp. 199-209.
17. 17. Bharati S, Rosen KM, Strasburg B, et al. Anatomic substrate for congenital atrioventricular block in middle-aged adults. PACE 1982; 5:860-869.
18. 18. Nadal-Cinard B, Mahdavi V. Molecular basis of cardiac performance. Plasticity of the myocardium generated through protein isoform switches. J Clin Invest 1989; 84:1693-1700.
19. 19. Schwartz K, Lecarpentier Y, Martin JL, et al. Myosin isoenzyme distribution correlates with speed of myocardial contraction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1981; 77:220-234.
20. 20. Tantengco MV, Humes RA, Karpawich PP. Left ventricular dysfunction in chronic right ventricular paced patients (abstract). J Heart Failure 1998; 5:20.
21. 21. Davies MJ. Congenital, surgical and post-traumatic A-V block. In Pathology of Conducting Tissue of the Heart. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Stamford, CT, 1971, pp. 120-128.
22. 22. Karpawich PP, Mital SR. Comparative left ventricular function following atrial, septal and apical single chamber heart pacing in the young. PACE 1997; 20:1983-1988.
23. 23. Barin ES, Jones SM, Ward DE, et al. The right ventricular outflow tract as an alternative permanent pacing site: Long-term follow-up. PACE 1991;14: 3-6.
24. 24. Karpawich PP, Paridon SM, Pinsky WW. Failure of rate-responsive ventricular pacing to improve physiologic performance in the univentricular heart. PACE 1991; 14:2058-2061.