Effects of training dose on the relationship between discriminative-stimulus and self-reported drug effects of d-amphetamine in humans

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 319-326

  Kollins, Scott H ^a   Rush, Craig R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

d Amphetamine; Drug discrimination; Humans; Stimulants; Subjective effects

Indexed keywords

DEXAMPHETAMINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF REPORT; TRAINING;

ADULT; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROMORPHONE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGONISTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0032821893     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00084-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abreu M.E., Griffiths R.R. Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 125:1996;255-257.
2. Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders. 4th ed:1994;American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.
3. Broadbent J., Michael E.K., Riddle E.E., Appel J.B. Involvement of dopamine uptake in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Behav. Pharmacol. 2:1991;187-197.
4. Broadbent J., Michael E.K., Appel J.B. Generalization of cocaine to the isomers of 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Effects of training dose Drug Dev. Res. 16:1989;433-450.
5. Chait L.D., Uhlenhuth E.H., Johanson C.E. The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of phenylpropanolamine, mazindol, and d-amphetamine in humans. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 24:1986;1665-1672.
6. Colpaert F.C., Janssen P.A. Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity. Limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in a cocaine-saline discrimination Neuropharmacology. 21:1982;1187-1194.
7. Cunningham K.A., Callahan P.M. Monoamine reuptake inhibitors enhance the discriminative state induced by cocaine in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 104:1991;177-180.
8. De Vry J., Slangen J.L. Effects of chlordiazepoxide training dose on the mixed agonist-antagonist properties of benzodiazepine receptor antagonist RO 15-1788, in a drug discrimination procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 88:1986;177-183.
9. Jasinski D.R. Assessment of the abuse potential of morphine-like drugs (methods used in man). Martin W.R. Drug addiction I. 1977;197-258 Springer Verlag, New York.
10. Martin W.R., Sloan J.W., Sapira J.D., Jasinski D.R. Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 12:1971;245-258.
11. Mumford G.K., Holtzman S.G. Qualitative differences in the discriminative stimulus effects of low and high doses of caffeine in the rat. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 258:1991;857-865.
12. Oliveto A.H., Bickel W.K., Kamien J.B., Hughes J.R., Higgins S.T. Effects of diazepam and hydromorphone in triazolam-trained humans under a novel-response drug discrimination procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 114:1994;417-423.
13. Overton D.A. Applications and limitations of the drug discrimination method for the study of drug abuse. Bozarth M.A. Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. 1989;291-340 Springer Verlag, New York.
14. Perkins K.A., D'Amico D., Sanders M., Grobe J.E., Wilson A, Stiller R.L. Influence of training dose on nicotine discrimination in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 126:1996;132-139.
15. Preston K.E., Bigelow G.E. Opioid discrimination in humans. Discriminative and subjective effects of progressively lower training dose Behav. Pharmacol. 9:1998;533-543.
16. Preston K.L., Bigelow G.E. Subjective and discriminative effects of drugs. Behav. Pharmacol. 2:1991;293-313.
17. Rush C.R., Critchfield T.S., Troisi J.R. III, Griffiths R.R. Discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam and buspirone in normal volunteers. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 63:1995;277-294.
18. Rush C.R., Kollins S.H., Pazzaglia P.J. Discriminative stimulus and self reported drug effects of methylphenidate, buproprion, and triazolam in d-amphetamine-trained humans. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 6:1998;32-44.
19. Rush C.R., Madakisira S., Goldman N.H., Woolverton W.L., Rowlett J.K. Discriminative stimulus effects of zolpidem in pentobarbital-trained subjects. Comparison with triazolam and caffeine in humans J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 280:1997;174-188.
20. Schuster, C. R.; Fiscman, M. W.; Johanson, C. E.: Internal stimulus control and the subjective effects of drugs. In: Johanson, C. E.; Thompson, T., eds. Behavioral pharmacology of human drug dependence. Research monograph 37. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. Public Health Service: Alcohol, Drug Abuse and mental Health Administration. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1981:116-129.
21. Stolerman I.P., D'Mello G.D. Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 73:1981;295-303.
22. Stolerman I.P., Garcha H.S., Pratt J.A., Kumar R. Role of training dose in discrimination of nicotine and related compounds by rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 84:1984;413-419.
23. Tang A.H., Franklin S.R. The discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats at two training doses. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 258:1991;926-931.
24. Terry P., Witkin J.M., Katz J.L. Pharmacological characterization of the novel discriminative stimulus effects of a low dose of cocaine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 270:1994;1041-1048.