Uterine and postnatal maternal effects in mice selected for differential rate of early development

Genetics

Volumn 153, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 905-917

  Rhees, Brian K ^a   Ernst, Cynthia A ^a   Miao, Christina H ^a   Atchley, William R ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GROWTH RATE; HEREDITY; MALE; MOTHER; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; POSTNATAL GROWTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; SEX DIFFERENCE; UTERUS; WEIGHT GAIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BIRTH WEIGHT; CROSSES, GENETIC; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GROWTH; MALE; MATERNAL-FETAL EXCHANGE; MICE; PREGNANCY; UTERUS; WEIGHT GAIN;

ANIMALIA; RODENTIA;

EID: 0032820032     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. AL-MURRANI, W. K. and R. C. ROBERTS, 1978 Maternal effects on body weight in mice selected for large and small size. Genet. Res. 32: 295-302.
2. ATCHLEY, W. R. and S. NEWMAN, 1989 A quantitative-genetics perspective on mammalian development. Am. Nat. 134: 486-512.
3. ATCHLEY, W. R., T. LOGSDON, D. E. COWLEY and E. J. EISEN, 1991 Uterine effects, epigenetics, and postnatal skeletal development in the mouse. Evolution 45: 891-909.
4. ATCHLFY, VV. R., S. Xu and D. E. COWLEY, 1997 Altering developmental trajectories in mice by restricted index selection. Genetics 146: 629-640.
5. BAILEY, D. R., R. K. SALMON, R. T. BERG and H. T. FREDEEN, 1988 Growth and body composition of mice selected for high body weight. Genome 30: 570-575.
6. BEACHAM, T. D., 1989 Genetic-variation in body-weight of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus-Gorbtischa). Genome 32: 227-231.
7. BEEMAN, R. W., K. S. FRIESEN and R. E. DENELL, 1992 Maternaleffect selfish genes in flour beetles. Science 256: 89-92.
8. BRUMBY, PJ., 1960 The influence of the maternal environment on growth in mice. Heredity 14: 1-18.
9. CIIEVERUD, J. M., 1984 Evolution by kin selection-a quantitative
10. genetic model illustrated by maternal performance in mice. Evolution 38s 766-777.
11. CIIEVERUDJ. M. and A. J. MOORE, 199-1 Quantitative genetics and the role of the environment provided by relatives in behavioral evolution, pp. 67-100 in Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution, edited by C. R. B. BOAKE. University of Chicago, Chicago.
12. COWLEY, D. E., D. POMP, W. R, ATCHLEY, E. J. EISEN and D. HAWKINSBRQWN, 1989 The impact of maternal uterine genotype on postnatal growth and adult body size in mice. Genetics 122:193-203.
13. Di MASSO, R. J., A. N. Rucci and M, T, FONT, 1990 Growth analysis in two lines of rats and their reciprocal Fl crosses under two nutritional environments: heterosis for body weight and maturing rate. Growth Dev. Aging 54: 117-123.
14. EISEN, E. J., 1970 Maternal effects on litter size in mice. Can. J, Genet. Cytol. 12: 209-216.
15. EISEN, EJ., 1976 Results of growth curve analyses in mice and rats, J. Anim. Sci. 42: 1008-1023.
16. ELOKSH, HA, , T.M.SuTHERl.ANOandJ.S. WILLIAMS, 1967 Prenatal and postnatal maternal influence on growth in mice. Genetics 57: 79-94,
17. ERNST, C. A., P. CRENSHAW and W. R. ATCHLEY, 1999a Effect of selection for development rate on reproductive onset in female mice. Genet. Res. (in press),
18. ERNST, C. A B. K. RUEES, C. H. MIAO and W. R. ATCHLEY, 1999b Effect of long-term early postnatal growth rate selection on survival and prenatal development of transferred mouse embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. (in press),
19. FALCONER, D. S., 1965 Maternal effects and selection response, pp. 763-774 in Genetics Today, Proceedings of the XI International Congress on Genetics, Vol. 3, edited by S. J. GEERTS. Pergamon, Oxford.
20. FALCONER, D. S. and T. F, C, MACKAY, 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ed. 4. Longman, Essex, United Kingdom. HEATH, D. D. and D, M, BLOUW, 1988 Are maternal effects in fish adaptive or merely physiological side effects?, pp, 178-201 in Maternal Effects as Adaptations, edited by T. A. MoussEAU and C, W. Fox. Oxford University Press, New York.
21. HERBKRTJ. G, , J. F. KIDWELL and HB. CHASE, 1979 The inheritance of growth and form in the mouse. IV, Changes in the variance components of weight, tail length and tail width during growth. Growth 43: 36-46,
22. KASSER, T. G., J, W. MABRY, L. L. BENYSHEK, DJ. CAMPION and RJ. MARTIN, 1983 Heterotic and maternal effects on body weight and the parameters of a logistic growth curve of LL and SS rats and their Fl offspring. Growth 47: 237-253,
23. KinwEix, J. F., A. HOWARD and A. K. LAIRD, 1969 The inheritance of growth and form in the mouse: IL The Gompertz growth equation. Growth 33: 339-352.
24. KIRKPATRICK, M, , and R. LANDE, 1989 The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43: 485-503.
25. KURNIANTO, E., A. SIIINJO and D. SUGA, 1998 Prenatal and postnatal maternal effects on body weight in cross-fostering experiment on two subspecies of mice. Exp. Anim. 47: 97-103.
26. LAIRD, A. K, , and A. HOWARD, 1967 Growth curves in inbred mice. Nature 213: 786-788.
27. LANDE, R. and M, KIRKPATRICK, 1990 Selection response in traits with maternal inheritance. Genet. Res. 55: 189-197.
28. MOORE, R. W., E. J. EISEN and L. C. ULBERG, 1970 Prenatal and postnatal maternal influences on growth in mice selected for body weight. Genetics 64: 59-68.
29. MOUSSEAU, T, A. and H. DINGLE, 1991 Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu. Rev. Entomol, 36: 511-534,
30. MOUSSEAU, T. A. and C. W. Fox, 1998 Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. NAGALJ., H, BAKKER and EJ. EISEN, 1976 Genetic analysis of nurse dams selected for six-week body weight or postweaning gain in mice. CanJ. Genet. Cytol, 18: 611-623.
32. PAUL, P. J., 1969 Growth curves for body weight of the laboratory rat. AustJ. Biol. Sci. 22: 1077-1080.
33. RAWUNOS, J. O., S. G. PANTULA and D. A. DICKEY, 1998 Applied Regression Analysis, Ed. 2. Springer-Verlag, New York.
34. REZNICKD., 1981 Grandfather effects-the genetics of inter-population differences in offspring size in the mosquito fish. Evolution 35: 941-953.
35. RISKA, B., J. J, RUTLEDGE and W. R. ATCHLEY, 1985 Covariance between direct and maternal genetic effects in mice, with a model of persistent environmental influences. Genet. Res. 45:287-297.
36. ROACH, D. A. and R. D. WULIT, 1987 Maternal effects in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 209-235.
37. ROSSITER, M. C., 1991 Environmentally-based maternal effects-a hidden force in insect population-dynamics. Oecologia 87: 288294.
38. ROSSITER, M. C., 1996 Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol, Syst. 27: 451-476.
39. RUTLEDGE, JJ., O. W. ROBINSON EJ. EISEN andj. E. LEGATES, 1972 Dynamics of genetic and maternal effects in mice.J. Anim. Sci. 35:911-918.
40. SAS INSTITUTE, 1988 SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Ed. 4. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
41. SAS INSTITUTE, 1992 SAS Technical Report P-229, SAS/STAT Sofivare: Changes and Enhancements, Release 6.07. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
42. SCIIAAL, B., 1984 Life history variation, natural selection, and maternal effects in plant populations, pp. 188-206 in Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology, edited by R. DIRZO and J. SARUKHAN. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
43. STEEL, R. G, D., J. H. TORRIE and D. A. DICKEY, 1997 Principles and Procedures of Statistics; A Diametrical Approach, Ed, 3. McGraw-Hill, New York.
44. TIIIEDE, D. A., 1998 Maternal inheritance and its effect on adaptive evolution: a quantitative genetic analysis of maternal effects in a natural plant population. Evolution 52: 998-1015.
45. WILLHAM, R. L, , 1963 The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19: 18-27.
46. WOLF, J, B., E. D, BRODIEJ. M. CIIEVERUD, A, J, MOORE and MJ. WADE, 1998 Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 64-69.