Determining the visibility of noise in motion signals

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 27, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 254-257

  Burns, Nicholas R ^a   Zanker, Johannes M ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Coherence threshold; Equivalent noise; Motion perception; Random dot kinematograms

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CINERADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOMETRY; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND DETECTION; VISIBILITY;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0032819847     PISSN: 08149763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00181.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Braddick O. Vis. Res. 1974; 14: 519-27.
2. Scase et al. Vis. Res. 1996; 36: 2579-86.
3. van Doom AJ, Koenderink JJ. Vis. Res. 1984; 24: 47-53.
4. Zanker JM. Vis. Res. 1993; 33: 553-69.
5. Pelli DG. In: Blakemore C. (eds). Vision: Coding and Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
6. Barlow HB. In: Barlow HB et al. (eds). Vertebrate Photoreception. London: Academic Press, 1977.
7. van de Grind WA. et al. Vis. Res. 1986; 26: 797-810.
8. Zanker JM. Vis. Res. 1999; 39: 1293-304.
9. Vaina LM et al. Cog. Brain Res. 1995; 2: 155-63.