Structured packs for independent learning: A comparison of learning outcome and acceptability with conventional teaching

Medical Education

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 579-584

  Graham, H J ^a   Seabrook, M A ^a,b   Woodfield, S J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical medicine, education; Education, medical, undergraduate, methods; Programmed instruction; Prospective studies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMMUNITY MEDICINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HOSPITAL; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; SATISFACTION; TEACHING;

CLINICAL MEDICINE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TEACHING MATERIALS;

EID: 0032818434     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00367.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. 1 General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors. London: GMC; 1993.
2. 2 Towle A, editor. Innovative learning and assessment. Sharing ideas 3. London: King's Fund Centre; 1994.
3. 3 Seabrook M, Booton P, Evans T. Widening the horizons of medical education. London: Kings Fund Centre; 1994.
4. 4 Graham HJ, Seabrook M. Structured packs for independent learning in the community. Med Educ 1995;29:61-5.
5. 5 Editor. Editors choice. BMJ 1997;315.
6. 6 Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ 1996;313:570-1.
7. 7 Rowntree D. Teaching through self-instruction. How to develop open learning materials. London: Kogan Page; 1990.
8. 8 Ausubel DP, Novak JD, Hanesian H. Educational psychology: a cognitive view. USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1978.
9. 9 Towle A, Cottrell D. Self-directed learning. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:357-9.