Delivery logbook: Scientific value of the collected data;Le cahier d'accouchement: Pertinence du recueil des donnees pour l'exploitation scientifique

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 369-372

  Dreyfus, M ^a   Tissier, I ^a   Ndocko, M A ^a   Philippe, M ^a   Ritter, J ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

Author keywords

Computerized recording; Delivery logbook; Registration of data

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILDBIRTH; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT INFORMATION; REGISTRATION;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA COLLECTION; DELIVERY ROOMS; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RECORDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0032816895     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Chez RA, Hill VS, Lowry LW. Logbook data as a source of birth information. Are they valid? J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 658-62.
2. Hahn RA, Mulinare J, Teutsch SM. Inconsistencies in coding of race and ethnicity between birth and death in US infants. JAMA 1992; 267: 259-63.
3. Parrish KM, Holt VL, Connell FA, Williams B, Lo Gerfo JP. Variations in the accuracy of obstetrical procedures and diagnosis on birth records in Washington State-1989. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138: 119-27.
4. Snell LM, Little BB, Knoll KA, Johnston WL Jr, Rosenfeld CR, Gant NF. Reliability of birth certificate reporting of congenital anomalles. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9: 219-22.
5. Kirby RS. The quality of data reported on birth certificates. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 301.
6. Taffel SM, Ventura AM, Gay GA. Revised US certificate of birth: New opportunities for research on birth outcome. Birth 1989; 16: 188-93.
7. Paine LL, Greener DL, Strobino DM. Birth registration: nurse-midwifery roles and responsibilities. J Nurse-Midwifery 1988; 33: 107-14.
8. Frigoletto FD Jr. CPR: Can we be resuscitated? Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 1-4.
9. Cleary R, Beard RW, Coles J, Devlin HB, Hopkins A, Roberts S et al. The quality of routinely collected maternity data. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 1042-7.