Comparison of three in vitro methods for the assessment of the eye- irritating potential of formulated cosmetic products

In Vitro and Molecular Toxicology: Journal of Basic and Applied Research

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 63-76

  Doucet, Olivier ^a   Lanvin, M ^b   Zastrow, L ^b  

^a International Research Center   (Monaco)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 PROPANOL; ALCOHOL; AMPHOTERICIN B DEOXYCHOLATE; BROMINE DERIVATIVE; COSMETIC; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; NEUTRAL RED; PENICILLIN G; SHAMPOO; STREPTOMYCIN;

ARTICLE; ASSAY; CELL CULTURE; CYTOTOXICITY; EMULSION; EPITHELIUM CELL; EYE IRRITATION; LOTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032816132     PISSN: 10979336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BALLS, M., BOTHAM, P.A., BRUNER, L.H., and SPIELMANN, H. (1995). The EC/HO validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicol. In Vitro 9, 871-929.
2. BORENFREUND, E., and PUERNER, J.A. (1984). A simple quantitative procedure using monolayer cultures for cytotoxicity assays (HTD/NR-90). J. Tissue Cult. Methods 9, 7-9.
3. BORENFREUND, E., and PUERNER, J.A. (1985). Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alteration and neutral red absorption. Toxicol. Letters 24, 119-124.
4. BRANTOM, P.G., BRUNER, L.H., CHAMBERLAIN, M., et al. (1997). A summary report of the COLIPA International Validation Study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicol. In Vitro 11, 141-179.
5. CETAMA (Commission d'Etablissement des Méthodes d'Analyses du Commissariat à l'énergie atomique) (1986). Comparison de variances, in: Statistique appliquéee à l'exploitation des mesures. Masson (eds.) Masson, Paris, France, pp. 205-222.
6. CURREN R., HARBELL J., and SOUTHEE J. (1996) Eye irritation: the search for non-animal models, in: Proceedings of an international scientific conference organized by the European cosmetic industry. S. Lisansky, R. Macmillan, and J. Dupuis (eds.) CPL Press: Newbury, UK, pp. 56-66.
7. DOUCET, O., LANVIN, M., and ZASTROW, L. (1998). A new in vitro human epithelial model for assessing the eye irritating potential of formulated cosmetic products. In Vitro Mol. Toxicol. 11, 273-283.
8. DOUCET, O., ROBERT, C., and ZASTROW, L. (1996). Use of a serum-free reconstituted epidermis as a skin pharmacological model. Toxicol. In Vitro 10, 305-313.
9. DRAIZE J.H., WOODWARD, G., and CALVERY, H.O. (1944). Methods for study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82, 377-390.
10. JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE. Arrêté du 09 Juillet (1992). J.O. du 10 Juillet 1992: Test d'Irritation Oculaire: Evaluation de l'Irritation Oculaire des produits cosmétiques ou d'hygiène corporelle.
11. JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE. Arrêté due 29 Novembre (1996). J.O. du 26 Décembre 1996: Méthode Officielle d'Evaluation du Potentiel Irritant par Application sur la Membrane Chorio-Allantoïdienne de l'oeuf de poule.
12. LANDIS, J.R., and KOCH, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159-174.
13. LUEPKE, N.P. (1985). Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food Chem. Toxicol. 23, 287-291.
14. MOSSMAN, T. (1983). Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55-63.
15. OSBORNE, R., PERKINS, M.A., and ROBERTS, D.A. (1995). Development and intralaboratory evaluation of an in vitro human cell-based test to aid ocular irritancy assessments. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 28, 139-153.
16. REGNIER, M., DESBAS, C., BAILLY, C., and DARMON, M. (1988). Differentiation of normal and tumoral human keratinocytes cultured on dermis: Reconstruction of either normal or tumoral architecture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 24, 625-632.
17. RUPNIAK, H.T., ROWLATT, C., LANE, E.B., et al. (1985). Characteristics of four new human cell lines derived from squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 75, 621-635.
18. SHAPIRO, S.S., and WILK, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591-611.
19. SHEASGREEN, J.E., KUBILUS, J., SENNOTT, H., OGLE, P., and KLAUSNER, M. (1996). Reproducibility and Correlation of EpiOcular™, a three-dimensional tissue culture model of the human corneal epithelium. Altern. Lab. Anim. 24, 284.
20. STERN, M., KLAUSNER, M., ALVARADO, R., RENSKERS, K., and DICKENS, M. (1998). Evaluation of the EpiOcular™ Tissue Model as an Alternative to the Draize Eye Irritation Test. Toxicol. In Vitro 12, 455-461.
21. TRIGLIA, D., SHERARD BRAA, S., YONAN, C., and NAUGHTON, G.K. (1991). Cytotoxicity testing using neutral red and MTT assays on a three-dimensional human skin substrate. Toxicol. In Vitro 5, 573-578.
22. WEIL, C.S., and SCALA, R.A. (1971). Study of intraand interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 19, 276-360.