The conflict between the science and the art of clinical practice in the next millennium

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 882, Issue , 1999, Pages 240-246

  Weatherall, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFLICT; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; SCIENCE; TEACHING;

EID: 0032813229     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08554.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. 1. Weatherall, D.J. 1995. Science and the Quiet Art. W.W. Norton & Company. New York; and Oxford University Press. Oxford.
2. 2. Booth, C.C. 1989. Clinical research. In Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC. J. Austoker and L. Bryder, Eds. :205-241. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
3. 3. Booth, C.C. 1993. History of science in medicine. In Science in Medicine: How Far has it Advanced? G. Teeling-Smith and C. Roberts, Eds.: 11-22. Office of Health Economics. London.
4. 4. Bynum, W. 1993. Historical background: medicine as dogma. In Science in Medicine: How Far has it Advanced? G. Teeling-Smith and C. Roberts, Eds. 1-10. Office of Health Economics. London.
5. 5. Hood, L. 1992. Biology and medicine in the twenty-first century. In The Code of Codes. D.J. Kevles and L. Hood, Eds.: 136-163. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Mass.
6. 6. Mayr, E. 1997. This is Biology, The Science of the Living World. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.
7. 7. Weatherall, D.J. Historical perspectives. In The Thalassaemia Syndromes, 4th ed. D.J. Weatherall and J.B. Clegg, Eds. Blackwell. Oxford. In press.