Victims no longer: Participatory planning with a diversity of women at risk of abuse

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 221-232

  Rahder, Barbara Loevinger ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPOWERMENT; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; WOMENS ORGANIZATION;

CANADA; DURHAM; ONTARIO;

EID: 0032812484     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456x9901800304     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners Journal 35:216-224.
2. Clavel, P. 1994. The evolution of advocacy planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 60:146-149.
3. D'Aubin, A., ed. 1988. Breaking the Silence. Winnipeg, Canada: Coalition of Provincial Organizations of the Handicapped.
4. Davidoff, P. 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31:331-8.
5. Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. 1992. Indian Register Population by Sex and Residence, 1992. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.
6. Forester, J. 1994. Bridging interests and community: advocacy planning and the challenges of deliberative democracy. Journal of American Planning Association 60:153-158.
7. Friedmann, J. 1992. Feminist and planning theories: The epistemological connection. Planning Theory Newsletter 7/8:40-43.
8. Friedmann, J. 1995. Teaching planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14:156-162.
9. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
10. Hartman, C. 1994. On poverty and racism, we have had little to say. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 60:158-159.
11. Hayden, D. 1995. The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. Healey, P. 1992. Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review 63:143-162.
13. Kapelos-Edwards Group. 1990. A Voice of Twenty-Nine: A Survey of Immigrant and Minority Women Who Have Experienced Wife Assault. Toronto, Canada: Rexdale Women's Center.
14. Kasperson, R.E. 1977. Participation through centrally planned social change: Lessons from the American experience on the urban scene. In Public Participation in Planning, eds. W.R.D. Sewell and J.T. Coppock, 173-190. London, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
15. King, D. K. 1989. Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. In Feminist theory in practice and process, eds. M.R. Malson, J.F. O'Barr, S. Westphal-Wihl, and M. Wyer, 75-105. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.
16. King, M. 1991. A framework for action. In Challenging Uneven Development: An Urban Agenda for the 1990s, eds. P.W. Nyden and W. Wiewel, 17-24. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
17. Klein, W.R. 1994. Citizen participation: Whose vision is it? In Planning and Community Equity, 159-172. Chicago, Ill.: Planners Press.
18. Klodawsky, F., C. Lundy, and C. Andrew. 1994. Challenging "business as usual" in housing and community planning: The issue of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 3:40-58.
19. Krumholz, N. 1994. Advocacy planning: Can it move the center? Journal of the American Planning Association 60:150-151.
20. Krumholz, N., and J. Forester. 1990. Making Equity Planning Work. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.
21. Krumholz, N., and P. Clavel. 1994. Reinventing Cities: Equity Planners Tell Their Stories. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.
22. Leavitt, J. 1992. Women under fire: Public housing activism in Los Angeles. Frontier 13:109-130.
23. Lee, B. 1992. Pragmatics of Community Organization. Mississauga, Ontario: Commonact Press.
24. MacGregor, S. 1995. Deconstructing the man made city: Feminist critiques of planning thought and action. In Change of Plans: Towards a Non-Sexist Sustainable City, ed. M. Eichler, 25-49. Toronto: Garamond Press.
25. MacLeod, L. 1989. Wife battering and the web of hope: Progress, dilemmas, and visions of prevention. Discussion paper. The National Clearinghouse on Family Violence, Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa.
26. Maison, M.R., J.F. O'Barr, S. Westphal-Wihl, and M. Wyer. 1989. Feminist Theory in Practice and Process. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
27. Marris, P. 1994. Advocacy planning as a bridge between the professional and the political. Journal of the American Planning Association 60:143-146.
28. Masuda, S., and J. Ridington. 1992. Meeting Our Needs: Access Manual for Transition Houses. Ottawa: DisAbled Women's Network Canada.
29. Modlich, R. 1988. Planning implication of Women Plan Toronto. Plan Canada 28(4):120-131.
30. Moore Milroy, B. 1992. Some thoughts about difference and pluralism. Planning Theory Newsletter 7/8:33-38.
31. Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. 1992. Terms of Reference: Four Shelter Committee Community Consultation Project. Peterborough, Canada.
32. Ontario Ministry of Health. 1992. Ontario Health Survey 1990. Toronto, Canada.
33. Peattie, L.R. 1968. Reflections on advocacy planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 34(2):80-88.
34. Peattie, L.R. 1994. Communities and interests in advocacy planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 60:151-153.
35. Rahder, Doyle & Associates and Jim Ward Associates. 1992. City Home Security Policy/Strategy Study. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto Housing Department.
36. Reardon, K.M. 1994. Community development in low-income minority neighborhoods: A case for empowerment planning. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, 4 November, Phoenix, Ariz.
37. Sandercock, L., and A. Forsyth. 1992. Feminist theory and planning theory: The epistemological linkages. Planning Theory Newsletter 7/8:45-49.
38. Sanford, B. 1988. St. James Town Revitalization: Social Analysis. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto Planning and Development Department.
39. So, F. 1994. Planning for human services. In Planning and Community Equity, 67-75. Chicago, Ill.: Planners Press.
40. Statistics Canada. 1986. Census. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
41. Statistics Canada. 1991. Census. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
42. Statistics Canada. 1993a. HALS: A survey that breaks barriers. Focus 7 (March).
43. Statistics Canada. 1993b. The Labour Force. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services.
44. Susskind, Y. 1995. Empowerment planning: an emergent paradigm for participation and equity. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, 22 October, Detroit, Mich.
45. University of British Columbia, Institute of Health Promotion Research and B.C. Consortium for Health Promotion Research. 1995. Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion. British Columbia: Royal Society of Canada.
46. Weeks, W. 1994. Women Working Together: Lessons from Feminist Women's Services. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.
47. Weisman, L.K. 1994. Discrimination by Design: A Feminist Critique of the Man-Made Environment. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
48. Wekerle, G.R., and C. Whitzman. 1995. Safe Cities: Guidelines for Planning, Design, and Management. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
49. Whitzman, C. 1992. Taking back planning: Promoting women's safety in public places - the Toronto experience. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 9:169-179.