The interplay of hybridization and clonal reproduction in the evolution of willows: Experiments with hybrids of S. eriocephala R and S. exigua X and S. eriocephala and S. petiolaris P

Plant Ecology

Volumn 141, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 163-178

  Salick, Jan ^a   Pfeffer, Edward ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apomixis; Introgression; Life history strategy; Mixed mating strategy; Speciation; Willow breeding

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CLONE; CLONING; CROSSING; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; HYBRID; INTROGRESSION; MODEL; MORPHOLOGY; PLANT BREEDING; SALIX ERIOCEPHALA; SALIX EXIGUA; SALIX PETIOLARIS;

ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION;

SALIX;

EID: 0032811813     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009858528374     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, E. 1948. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2: 1-9.
2. Anderson, E. & Hubricht, L., 1938. Hybridization in Tradescandia. The evidence for introgressive hybridization. Am. J. Bot. 25: 396-402.
3. Anderson, E. & Stebbins, G. 1954. Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8: 378-388.
4. Argus, G. 1974. An experimental study of hybridization and pollination in Salix (willow). Can. J. Bot. 52: 1613-1619.
5. Argus, G. 1986. The genus Salix in the Southeastern United States. Systematic Botany Monographs 9: 1-170. The American Society of Plant Taxonomists, Ann Arbor.
6. Arnold, M. 1994. Natural hybridization and Louisiana irises. Bio-Science 44: 141-147.
7. Arnold, M. & Hodges, S. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Tr. Ecol. Evol. 10: 67-71.
8. Brunsfeld, S., Soltis, D. & Soltis, P. 1992. Evolutionary patterns and processes in Salix sect. Longifoliae: Evidence from chloroplast DNA. Syst. Bot. 17: 239-256.
9. Dobzhansky, T., Ayala, F., Stebbins, G. & Valentine, J. 1977. Evolution. W. H. Freeman Company, San Francisco.
10. Dowdy, S. & Wearden, S. 1991. Statistics for research, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11. Ellstrand, N. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation Genetics. Oikos 63: 63-77.
12. Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York.
13. Harrison, R. 1993. Hybrids and hybrid zones: Historical perspective. Pp. 3-12. In: R. Harrison (ed.), Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Heslop-Harrison, J. & Heslop-Harrison, Y. 1970. Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence: Intracellular hydrolysis of fluoroscein diacetate. Stain Technol. 45: 115-220.
15. Huskins, C. 1931. The origin of the Spartina townsendii. Nature 127: 781.
16. Kenney, W. & Vanstone, B. 1993. Willow energy farm demonstration. Efficiency and Alternative Energy Technology Branch/CANNET, Ottawa, Ontario.
17. Kiem, P., Paige, K., Whitham, T. & Lark, K. 1989. Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm of Populus: Occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123: 557-565.
18. Lamont, B. 1988. Sexual versus vegetative reproduction in Banksia elegans. Bot. Gaz. 149: 370-375.
19. Levin, D., Javier, F. & Jansen, R. 1996. Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Cons. Biol. 10: 10-16.
20. McLellan, A.J., Prati, D., Kaltz, O. & Schmid, B. 1997. Structure and analysis of phenotypic and genetic variation in clonal plants. Pp. 185-210. In: de Kroon, H. & van Groenendael, J. (eds), The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Bac@uys Publ., Leiden.
21. Morin, P. 1983. Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol. Monogr. 53: 119-138.
22. Mosseler, A. 1987. Interspecific hybridization and reproductive barriers between some North American willow species. Ph. D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
23. Mosseler, A., Zsuffa, M., Stoehr, W. & Kenney, W. 1988. Variation in biomass production, moisture content, and specific gravity in some North American willows (Salix L.). Can. J. Forest Res. 18: 1535-1540.
24. Mosseler, A. & Papadopol, M. 1989. Seasonal isolation as a reproductive barrier among sympatric Salix species. Can. J. Bot., 67: 2563-2570.
25. Potts, B. & Reid, J. 1990. The evolutionary significance of hybridization in Eucalyptus. Evolution 44: 2151-2152.
26. Pyke, D. & Thompson, J. 1986. Statistical analysis of survival and removal rate experiments. Ecology 67: 240-245.
27. Rieseberg, L. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 944-953.
28. Rieseberg, L., Zona, S., Aberbom, L. & Martin, T. 1989. Hybridization and the island endemic, Catalina mahogany. Cons. Biol. 3: 52-58.
29. Rieseberg, L. & Wendel, J. 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants. Pp. 70-109. In: Harrison, R. (ed.), Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Rieseberg, L., Sinervo, B., Linder, C., Ungerer, M. & Arias, D. 1996. Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: Evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272: 741-745.
31. Schmid, B. & Weiner, R. 1993. Plastic relationships between reproductive and vegetative mass in Solidago altissima. Evolution 47: 61-74.
32. Silander, J. 1985. Microevolution in clonal plants. Pp. 107-152. In: Jackson, J., Buss, L. & Cook, R. (Eds), Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale university Press, New Haven.
33. Sorensson, T. & Brewbaker, J. 1994. Interspecific compatibility among 15 Leucaena species. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 240-247.
34. Stebbins, L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
35. Straw, R. 1955. Hybridization, homogamy and sympatric speciation. Evolution 9: 441-4144.