Prediction assessment of shrinkage estimators of multiplicative models for multi-environment cultivar trials

Crop Science

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 998-1009

  Cornelius, Paul L ^a   Crossa, José ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVE MAIN EFFECTS AND MULTIPLICATIVE INTERACTION; CULTIVAR; GENOTYPE; MODEL; PLANT BREEDING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032811688     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040007x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Carlin, B.P., and T.A. Louis. 1996. Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.
2. Cornelius, P.L. 1993. Statistical tests and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 33:1186-1193.
3. Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa, and M.S. Seyedsadr. 1993. Tests and estimators of multiplicative models for variety trials. p. 156-166. In Proceedings of Annual Kansas State University Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture, 5th. Manhattan, KS. 25-27 April 1993. Dep. of Statistics, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS.
4. Cornelius, P.L., and J. Crossa. 1995. Shrinkage estimators of multiplicative models for crop cultivar trials. Technical Report No. 352, University of Kentucky, Dep. of Statistics, Lexington.
5. Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa, and M.S. Seyedsadr. 1996. Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction. p. 199-234. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
6. Cornelius, P.L., and M.S. Seyedsadr. 1997. Estimation of general linear-bilinear models for two-way tables. J. Statist. Computing Simulation 58:287-322.
7. Crossa, J., and P.L. Cornelius. 1993. Recent developments in multiplicative models for cultivar trials. p. 571-577. In D.R. Buxton et al. (ed.) International Crop Science I. CSSA, Madison, WI.
8. Feinberg, G.E. 1972. Discussion on D.V. Lindley and A.F.M. Smith, Bayes estimates for the linear model. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B, 34:30-32.
9. Galambos, J. 1982. Exchangeability, vol. 2, p. 573-577. In S. Kotz and N.L. Johnson (ed.) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
10. Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705-715.
11. Gauch, H.G., Jr., and R.W. Zobel. 1988. Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:1-10.
12. Gauch, H.G., Jr., and R.W. Zobel. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. p. 85-122. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Goodman, L.A., and S.J. Haberman. 1990. The analysis of nonadditivity in two-way analysis of variance. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 72: 320-338.
14. Gollob, H.F. 1968. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33:73-115.
15. Harville, D.A. 1977. Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and related problems. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 72:320-338.
16. Harville, D.A. 1991. Comment on Robinson, G.K., That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Statist. Sci. 6:37-39.
17. Henderson, C.R. 1984. Applications of mixed models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
18. Hoerl, A.E., and R.W. Kennard. 1970. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55-67.
19. Hoerl, A.E., and R.W. Kennard. 1988. Ridge regression. vol. 8, p. 129-136. In S. Kotz and N.L. Johnson (ed.) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
20. James, W., and C. Stein. 1961. Estimation with quadratic loss. p. 361-379. In Proc. Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob., 4th, Vol. 1. University of California Press, Berkeley.
21. Johnson, D.E., and V. Hegemann. 1976. The power of two tests for nonadditivity. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 71:945-948.
22. Lemmer, H.H. 1988. Shrinkage estimators. vol. 8, p. 452-456. In S. Kotz and N.L. Johnson (ed.) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
23. Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
24. Lindley, D.V., and A.F.M. Smith. 1972. Bayes estimates for the linear model. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B., 34:1-41.
25. Mandel, J. 1961. Non-additivity in two-way analysis of variance. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 56:878-888.
26. Piepho, H.P. 1994. Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for regional yield trials: A comparison to additive main affects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 647-654.
27. Robinson, G.K. 1991. That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Statist. Sci. 6:15-51.
28. SAS Institute Inc. 1989a. SAS language: Reference, Version 6, First Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
29. SAS Institute Inc. 1989b. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6, First Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
30. SAS Institute Inc. 1989c. SAS/IML Software: Usage and reference. Version 6, First Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
31. SAS Institute Inc. 1997. SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
32. Seyedsadr, M.S., and P.L. Cornelius. 1992. Shifted multiplicative models for nonadditive two-way tables. Commun. Statist., B. Simulation Computation 21:807-822.
33. Viele, K., and C. Srinivasan. 1998. Parsimonious estimation of multiplicative interaction in analysis of variance using Kullback-Leibler information. Tech. Rep. 362. University of Kentucky, Dep. of Statistics. Lexington.