Location in History: Argentina and South Africa in the Nineteenth Century

Journal of World History

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 41-

  Curtin, Philip D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL PLACE THEORY; HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY; LOCATION DECISION; NINETEENTH CENTURY; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION;

ARGENTINA; SOUTH AFRICA;

EID: 0032809299     PISSN: 10456007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jwh.2005.0006     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Several important works already deal comparatively with other aspects of South African and Argentine history, such as Carol E. Solberg, The Prairies and the Pampas: Agrarian Policy in Canada and Argentina, 1880-1930 (Stanford, 1987); Jeremy Adelman, Frontier Development: Land, Labour, and Capital on the Wheatlands of Argentina and Canada, 1890- 1914 (Oxford, 1994); J. P. Fogerty, E. Gallo, and H. Dieguez, eds., Argentina y Australia (Buenos Aires, 1979); and Donald Denoon, Settler Capitalism: The Dynamics of Dependent Development in the Southern Hemisphere (Oxford, 1983). Other comparative histories deal with historical comparisons between the United States and South Africa. See George Frederickson, White Supremacy: A Comparative Study of American and South African History (New York, 1981); and Howard Lamar and Leonard Thompson, eds., The Frontier in History: North America and Southern Africa Compared (New Haven, 1981).
2. Several important works already deal comparatively with other aspects of South African and Argentine history, such as Carol E. Solberg, The Prairies and the Pampas: Agrarian Policy in Canada and Argentina, 1880-1930 (Stanford, 1987); Jeremy Adelman, Frontier Development: Land, Labour, and Capital on the Wheatlands of Argentina and Canada, 1890-1914 (Oxford, 1994); J. P. Fogerty, E. Gallo, and H. Dieguez, eds., Argentina y Australia (Buenos Aires, 1979); and Donald Denoon, Settler Capitalism: The Dynamics of Dependent Development in the Southern Hemisphere (Oxford, 1983). Other comparative histories deal with historical comparisons between the United States and South Africa. See George Frederickson, White Supremacy: A Comparative Study of American and South African History (New York, 1981); and Howard Lamar and Leonard Thompson, eds., The Frontier in History: North America and Southern Africa Compared (New Haven, 1981).
3. Several important works already deal comparatively with other aspects of South African and Argentine history, such as Carol E. Solberg, The Prairies and the Pampas: Agrarian Policy in Canada and Argentina, 1880-1930 (Stanford, 1987); Jeremy Adelman, Frontier Development: Land, Labour, and Capital on the Wheatlands of Argentina and Canada, 1890- 1914 (Oxford, 1994); J. P. Fogerty, E. Gallo, and H. Dieguez, eds., Argentina y Australia (Buenos Aires, 1979); and Donald Denoon, Settler Capitalism: The Dynamics of Dependent Development in the Southern Hemisphere (Oxford, 1983). Other comparative histories deal with historical comparisons between the United States and South Africa. See George Frederickson, White Supremacy: A Comparative Study of American and South African History (New York, 1981); and Howard Lamar and Leonard Thompson, eds., The Frontier in History: North America and Southern Africa Compared (New Haven, 1981).
4. Several important works already deal comparatively with other aspects of South African and Argentine history, such as Carol E. Solberg, The Prairies and the Pampas: Agrarian Policy in Canada and Argentina, 1880-1930 (Stanford, 1987); Jeremy Adelman, Frontier Development: Land, Labour, and Capital on the Wheatlands of Argentina and Canada, 1890- 1914 (Oxford, 1994); J. P. Fogerty, E. Gallo, and H. Dieguez, eds., Argentina y Australia (Buenos Aires, 1979); and Donald Denoon, Settler Capitalism: The Dynamics of Dependent Development in the Southern Hemisphere (Oxford, 1983). Other comparative histories deal with historical comparisons between the United States and South Africa. See George Frederickson, White Supremacy: A Comparative Study of American and South African History (New York, 1981); and Howard Lamar and Leonard Thompson, eds., The Frontier in History: North America and Southern Africa Compared (New Haven, 1981).
5. Several important works already deal comparatively with other aspects of South African and Argentine history, such as Carol E. Solberg, The Prairies and the Pampas: Agrarian Policy in Canada and Argentina, 1880-1930 (Stanford, 1987); Jeremy Adelman, Frontier Development: Land, Labour, and Capital on the Wheatlands of Argentina and Canada, 1890- 1914 (Oxford, 1994); J. P. Fogerty, E. Gallo, and H. Dieguez, eds., Argentina y Australia (Buenos Aires, 1979); and Donald Denoon, Settler Capitalism: The Dynamics of Dependent Development in the Southern Hemisphere (Oxford, 1983). Other comparative histories deal with historical comparisons between the United States and South Africa. See George Frederickson, White Supremacy: A Comparative Study of American and South African History (New York, 1981); and Howard Lamar and Leonard Thompson, eds., The Frontier in History: North America and Southern Africa Compared (New Haven, 1981).
6. Several important works already deal comparatively with other aspects of South African and Argentine history, such as Carol E. Solberg, The Prairies and the Pampas: Agrarian Policy in Canada and Argentina, 1880-1930 (Stanford, 1987); Jeremy Adelman, Frontier Development: Land, Labour, and Capital on the Wheatlands of Argentina and Canada, 1890- 1914 (Oxford, 1994); J. P. Fogerty, E. Gallo, and H. Dieguez, eds., Argentina y Australia (Buenos Aires, 1979); and Donald Denoon, Settler Capitalism: The Dynamics of Dependent Development in the Southern Hemisphere (Oxford, 1983). Other comparative histories deal with historical comparisons between the United States and South Africa. See George Frederickson, White Supremacy: A Comparative Study of American and South African History (New York, 1981); and Howard Lamar and Leonard Thompson, eds., The Frontier in History: North America and Southern Africa Compared (New Haven, 1981).