Ecotoxicity of riverbank spring water along the Hanford Reach, Columbia River

Environmental Toxicology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 473-480

  Delistraty, Damon A ^a   Yokel, Jerry ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioassay; Columbia river; Daphnid; Ecotoxicity; Fathead minnow; Groundwater; Hanford site; Riverbank spring

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COPPER; GROUND WATER; HEAVY METAL; NICKEL; RIVER WATER; ZINC;

BIOASSAY; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; GROWTH; HEAVY METAL; REPRODUCTION; SPRING WATER; SURVIVAL; TOXIC MATERIAL; TOXICITY; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; DAPHNIA; ECOTOXICITY; FISH; GROWTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SURVIVAL; UNITED STATES; WATER POLLUTION;

COLUMBIA RIVER; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON;

CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; PIMEPHALES PROMELAS;

EID: 0032805682     PISSN: 15204081     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7278(199912)14:5<473::AID-TOX4>3.0.CO;2-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Becker, C. D. Aquatic Bioenvironmental Studies: The Hanford Experience 1944-84; Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, 1990.
2. Calabrese, E. J.; Baldwin, L. A. Int J Toxicol 1997, 16, 545-559.
3. Cooney, J. D. In Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate, and Risk Assessment; Rand, G. M., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 71-102.
4. Damkaer, D. M.; Dey, D. B. Effects of water-borne pollutants on salmon passage at John Day Dam, Columbia River (1982-1986). Final Report; National Marine Fisheries Service: Seattle, WA, 1986.
5. Delistraty, D. A. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1986, 36, 114-121.
6. Delistraty, D. A.; Yokel, J. Bull Environ Contain Toxicol 1998, 61, 754-761.
7. Dirkes, R. L.; Hanf, R. W. Eds.; Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1997. PNNL-11795; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Richland, WA, 1998.
8. Friant, S. L.: Brandt, C. A. In A Review of Ecological Assessment Case Studies from a Risk Assessment Perspective, Vol. II, EPA/630/R-94/003; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1994, pp. 3-1 to 3-B4.
9. Geist, D. R.; Poston, T. M.; Dauble, D. D. Assessment of potential impacts of major groundwater contaminants to fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River. PNL-9990; Pacific Northwest Laboratory: Richland, WA, 1994.
10. Heitmuller, P. T.; Hollister, T. A.; Parrish, P. R. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1981, 27, 596-604.
11. Higley, K. A.; Kuperman, R. In Ecological Risk Assessment Methodology, Technical Memorandum for Ecological Chemicals of Concern (ECOCs) Screening Methodology. RF/ER-96-0039; Kaiser-Hill/Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, 1996, Appendix C.
12. Luckey, T. D. Health Phys 1982, 43, 771-789.
13. Mayer, F. L.; Marking, L. L.; Bills, T. D.; Howe, G. E. In Bioavailability: Physical, Chemical, and Biological Interactions; Hamelink, J. L. et al., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, 1994, pp. 5-22.
14. McCormack, W. D.; Carlile, J. M. V. Investigation of ground-water seepage from the Hanford shoreline of the Columbia River. PNL-5289; Pacific Northwest Laboratory: Richland, WA, 1984.
15. Mount, D. R.; Gulley, D. D.; Hockett, J. R.; Garrison, T. D.; Evans, J. M. Environ Toxicol Chem 1997, 16, 2009-2019.
16. Newman, M. C.; Jagoe, C. H. In Biovailability: Physical, Chemical, and Biological Interactions; Hamelink, J. L. et al., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, 1994, pp. 39-61.
17. Pillai, K. S.; Mane, U. H. Toxicol Lett 1984, 22, 139-144.
18. PNNL (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory). Screening assessment and requirements for a comprehensive assessment: Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment. DOE/RL-96-16; U.S. Department of Energy: Richland, WA, 1998.
19. Saldi, K. A.; Dirkes, R. L. In Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1995; Dirkes, R. L.; Hanf, R. W., Eds.; PNNL-11139; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1996, pp. 109-137.
20. Saldi, K. A.; Dirkes, R. L.; Blanton, M. L. In Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1994; Dirkes, R. L.; Hanf, R. W, Eds.; PNL-10574; Pacific Northwest Laboratory: Richland, WA, 1995, pp. 125-148.
21. Sprague, J. B. In Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate, and Risk Assessment; Rand, G. M, Ed.; Taylor & Francis: Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 1012-1051.
22. Stebbing, A. R. D. BELLE Newsletter 1997, 6(2), 1-11.
23. Suter, G. W.; Tsao, C. L. Toxicological benchmarks for screening potential contaminants of concern for effects on aquatic biota: 1996 revision. ES/ER/TM-96/R2; Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, 1996.
24. rd ed. EPA-600-4-91-002; Cincinnati, OH, 1994.
25. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Aquatic Toxicity Information Retrieval (AQUIRE) database; USEPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN, 1998.
26. WEST (Western EcoSystems Technology). TOXSTAT, version 3.5. Cheyenne, WY, 1996.
27. Wood, C. M.; Adams, W. J.; Ankley, G. T.; DiBona, D. R.; Luoma, S. N.; Playle, R. C.; Stubblefield, W. A.; Bergman, H. L.; Erickson, R. J.; Mattice, J. S.; Schlekat, C. E. In Reassessment of Metals Criteria for Aquatic Life Protection; Bergman, H. L.; Dorward-King, E. J, Eds.; SETAC Press: Pensacola, FL, 1997, pp. 31-56.