Discretion, flexibility, and certainty in British planning: Emerging ideological conflicts and inherent political tensions

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 244-256

  Tewdwr Jones, Mark ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING PROCESS; PLANNING SYSTEM; SPATIAL PLANNING;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032803155     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9901800306     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allmendinger, P., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 1997. Post-Thatcherite urban planning and politics: A Major change. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 21(1):100-116.
2. Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 1992. Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16(4): 571-587.
3. Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 1995. Globalisation, institutional "thickness" and the local economy. In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, eds. P. Healey, S.J. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, A. Mandani-Pour, 91-108. London, U.K.: John Wiley.
4. Brindley T., Y. Rydin, and G. Stoker. 1989. Remaking Planning: The Politics of Change in the Thatcher Years. London, U.K.: Unwin Hyman.
5. Booth, P. 1996. Controlling development: certainty and discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong. London, U.K.: UCL Press.
6. Bulpitt, J. 1983. Territory and Power in the U.K.: An Interpretation. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.
7. Cullingworth, J.B. 1993. The Political Culture of Planning: American Land Use Planning in Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.
8. Davies, H.W.E., A. Rowley, and D. Edwards. 1986. The relationship between development plans, development control and appeals. Working Paper 10. Department of Land Management and Development, Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, University of Reading, U.K.
9. Davies, H.W.E., J. Edwards, A.J. Hooper, and J.V. Punter. 1989. Planning Control in Western Europe. London, U.K.: HMSO.
10. Department of the Environment. 1996. Town centers and retail development: PPG6. London, U.K.: HMSO.
11. Department of the Environment/Department of Transport. 1994. Transport: PPG13 London, U.K.: HMSO.
12. Department of the Environment/Welsh Office. 1992. General Policy and Principles: PPG1. London, U.K.: HMSO.
13. Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. London, U.K.: Duckworth.
14. Gamble, A. 1988. The Free Economy and the Strong State. London, U.K.: Macmillan.
15. Griffiths, R. 1986. Planning in retreat? Town planning and the market in the 1980s. Planning Practice and Research 1:3-7.
16. Ham, C., and M. Hill. 1985. The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Sussex, U.K.: Wheatsheaf.
17. Healey, P. 1992. Development plans and markets. Planning Practice and Research 7(2):13-20.
18. Healey, P. 1996. Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society. Paper presented to the Shaping Places: Conceptions and Directions for Spatial Planning Conference, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, October.
19. Healey, P., and T. Shaw. 1993. The treatment of the environment by planners: Evolving concepts and practices in development plans. Working Paper 31. Center for Research in European Urban Environments, Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
20. HM Government. 1994. Competitiveness. London, U.K.: HMSO.
21. Jones, R. 1982. Town and Country Chaos. London, U.K.: Adam Smith Institute.
22. Jowell, J. 1973. The legal control of administrative discretion. Public Law 178-219.
23. Layfield, F. 1990. Material considerations in planning: The law. Journal of Planning and Environment Law 17:6-16
24. MacGregor, B., and A. Ross. 1995. Master or servant? The changing role of the development plan in the British planning system. Town Planning Review 66(1).
25. Page, E. 1985. State development and local government: A comparative study. Paper presented to XIII World Congress of the Integrated Political Science Association, July 1985, Paris, France.
26. Peck, F. 1996. Regional development and the production of space: The role of infrastructure in the attraction of new inward investment. Environment and Planning A 28:327-239.
27. Pickvance, C. 1991. The difficulty of control and the ease of structural reform: British local government in the 1980s. In State Restructuring and Local Power: A Comparative Perspective, eds. C. Pickvance, E. Preteceille, 48-88. London, U.K.: Pinter.
28. Purdue, M. 1989. Material considerations in planning: An ever expanding concept? Journal of Planning and Environment Law 41:156-161.
29. Rhodes, R.A.W. 1980. Some myths in central-local government relations. Town Planning Review 51:270-285.
30. Rhodes, R.A.W. 1981. Control and Power in Central-Local Government Relations. Aldershot, U.K.: Gower.
31. Rhodes, R.A.W. 1988. Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: Sub-Central Governments of Britain. London, U.K.: Unwin Hyman.
32. Sharpe, L.J., ed. 1979. Decentralist Trends in Western Democracies. London, U.K.: Sage.
33. Tewdwr-Jones, M. 1994a. The development plan in policy implementation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 12(2):145-163.
34. Tewdwr-Jones, M. 1994b. The government's planning policy guidance. Journal of Planning and Environment Law 46(2):106-16
35. Tewdwr-Jones, M, ed. 1996. British Planning Policy in Transition: Planning in the 1990s. London, U.K.: UCL Press.
36. Tewdwr-Jones, M. 1997. Plans, policies and intergovernmental relations: Assessing the role of national planning guidance in England and Wales. Urban Studies 34(1):141-162.
37. Thornley, A. 1991. Urban Planning Under Thatcherism: The Challenge of the Market. London, U.K.: Routledge.
38. Thornley A. 1993. Urban Planning Under Thatcherism: The Challenge of the Market. 2nd edition. London, U.K.: Routledge.
39. Thornley, A. 1996. Planning policy and the market. In British Planning Policy in Transition: Planning in the 1990s, ed. M. Tewdwr-Jones, 189-204. London, U.K.: UCL Press.
40. Underwood, J. 1980. Town planners in search of a role. SAUS occasional paper. University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.