The Effect Of Check Size On Veps In Healthy Humans: A Parabolic Relationship Between Check Size And N145 Wave

Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 105-118

  Şahinoglu, Babür ^a   Erar, Hacer ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

check size; N75, PI00, N145; pattern reversal; visual evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0032802039     PISSN: 07926855     EISSN: 21910286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JBCPP.1999.10.2.105     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ristanovic, D, Hajdukovic, R. Effects of spatially structured stimulus fields on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1981; 51: 599–610.
2. Rossini, PM, Pirchio, M, Treviso, M, Gambi, D, Di Paolo, B, Albertazzi, A. Checkerboard reversal pattern and flash VEPs in dialysed and non-dialysed subjects. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1981; 52: 435–444.
3. Oishi, M, Yamada, T, Dickins, QS, Kimura, J. Visual evoked potentials by different check sizes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1985; 35: 1461–1465.
4. Kurita-Tashima, S, Tobimatsu, S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M, Kato, M. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1991; 80: 161–166.
5. Kurita-Tashima, S, Tobimatsu, S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M, Kato, M. The neurophysio logic significance of frontal negativity in pattem-reversal visual-evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sei 1992; 33: 2423–2428.
6. Cobb, WA, Morton, HB, Ettlinger, G. Cerebral potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry. Nature 1967; 216: 1123–1125.
7. van Lith, GHM, van Marie, GW, van Dok-Mak, GTM. Variation in latency times of visually evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 220–222.
8. Skuse, NF, Burke, D, McKeon, B. Reproducibility of the visual evoked potential using a light-emitting diode stimulator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1984; 47: 623–629.
9. Evans, BT, Binnie, CD, Lloyd, DSL. A simple visual pattern stimulator. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1974; 37: 403–406
10. Epstein, CM. True checkerboard pattern reversal with light-emitting diodes. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1979; 47: 611–613.
11. Spydell, JD. A low-cost light-emitting diode photic stimulator. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1983; 55: 485–486.
12. Bartl, G, van Lith, GHM, van Marie, GW. Cortical potentials evoked by a TV pattern reversal stimulus with varying check sizes and stimulus field. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 216–219.
13. Haimovic, IC, Pedley, TA. Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. L Normal subjects. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1982; 54: 111–120.
14. Novak, GP, Wiznitzer, M, Kurtzberg, D, Giesser, BS, Vaughan, HG Jr. The utility of visual evoked potentials using hemifield stimulation and several check sizes in the evaluation of suspected multiple sclerosis. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1988; 71: 1–9.
15. Rowe, MJ. A sequential technique for half-field pattern visual evoked potential testing. Electroenceph din Neurophysiol 1981; 51: 463–469.
16. Regan, D, Heron, JR. Clinical investigation of lesions of the visual pathway: a new objective technique. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1969; 32: 479–483.
17. Polyak, SL. The Retina. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1941.
18. Sokol, S. Visual evoked potentials: theory, techniques and clinical application. Surv Ophthalmol 1976; 21: 18–44.