Modeling variable density flow and solute transport in porous medium: 2. Re-evaluation of the salt dome flow problem

Transport in Porous Media

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 375-394

  Younes, A ^a   Ackerer, Ph ^a   Mose, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Density driven flow; Groundwater; Numerical simulation; Salt dome

Indexed keywords

FLOW; GROUND WATER; MATHEMATICAL MODEL;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); DISPERSIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL METHODS; POROUS MATERIALS; SALTS; TENSORS;

DISPERSION EQUATIONS; MOLECULAR DIFFUSION; SALT DOME FLOW PROBLEM; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

GROUNDWATER;

DENSITY; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER; POROUS MEDIUM; SALT; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

EID: 0032799706     PISSN: 01693913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006504326005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ackerer, Ph., Younès, A. and Mosé, R.: Modeling variable density flow and solute transport in porous medium: 1. Numerical model and verification, Transport in Porous Media 35, 345-373 (this issue).
2. Andersson, K., Grundfelt, B., Hodgkinson, D. P., Lindbom, B. and Jackson, C. P.: 1986, HY-DROCOIN level 1 final report: verification of groundwater flow models, Swed. Nucl. Power Inspectorate (SKI).
3. Atkinson, R., Herbert, A. W., Jackson, C. P. and Robinson, P. C.: 1985, NAMMU User guide, Harwell Rep. AERE-R. 11364, Her Majesty's Stationary Off., London.
4. Bear, J.: 1979, Hydraulics of Groundwater, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Chavent, G. and Roberts, J. E.: 1991, A unified physical presentation of mixed, mixed hybrid finite elements and standard finite difference approximations for the determination of velocities in water flow problems, Adv. Water Resour. 14(6), 329-348.
6. Diersch, H. J. and Kolditz, O.: 1998, Coupled groundwater flow and transport: 2. Thermoline and 3D convection systems, Adv. Water Resour. 21, 401-425.
7. Gupta, S. K., Kincaid, C. T., Meyer, P. R., Newbill, C. A. and Cole, C. R.: 1983, CFEST, multidimensional finite element code for the analysis of coupled fluid, energy and solute transport, Rep. PNL-4260, Pac. Northwest Lab., Richland, Washington.
8. Herbert, A. W., Jackson, C. P. and Lever, D. A.: 1988, Coupled groundwater flow and solute transport with fluid density strongly dependent on concentration, Water Resour. Res. 24(10), 1781-1795.
9. Johns, R. and Rivera, A.: 1996, Comment on 'Dispersive transport dynamics in a strongly coupled groundwater-brine flow system' by C. Oldenburg and K. Pruess, Water Resour. Res. 32(11), 3405-3410.
10. Konikow, L. F., Campbell, P. J. and Sanford, W. E.: 1996, Modelling brine transport in a porous medium: a re-evaluation of the HYDROCOIN Level 1, Case 5 problem, In: K. Kovar and P. Van Der Heijde (eds), Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modeling, IAHS Publ. 237, pp. 363-372.
11. Konikow, L. F., Sanford, W. E. and Campbell, P. J.: 1997, Constant concentration boundary conditions: lessons from the HYDROCOIN variable-density groundwater benchmark problem, Water Resour. Res. 33(10), 2253-2261.
12. Mosé, R., Siegel, P., Ackerer, P. and Chavent, G.: 1994, Application of the mixed hybrid finite element approximation in a groundwater flow model: luxury or necessity ? Water Resour. Res. 30(11), 3001-3012.
13. Oldenburg, C. M. and Pruess, K.: 1995, Dispersive transport dynamics in a strongly coupled groundwater-brine system, Water Resour. Res. 31(2), 289-302.
14. Oldenburg, C. M., Pruess, K. and Travis, B. J.: 1996, Reply on 'Comment on Dispersive transport dynamics in a strongly coupled groundwater-brine system' by Johns and Rivera (1996), Water Resour. Res. 32(11), 3411-3412.
15. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): 1988, The International Hydrocoin Project, Level 1, Code verification, Rep. 71617, Paris.
16. OECD, The International Hydrocoin Project, Level 3: 1992, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, Rep. 76319, Paris.
17. Pruess, K.: 1987, TOUGH user's guide, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Report NUREG/CR-4645, June 1987 (also Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report, LBL-20700, Berkeley, California).
18. Pruess, K.: 1991, TOUGH2 - A general purpose numerical simulator for multiphase fluid and heat flow, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report, LBL-29400, Berkeley, California.
19. Raviart, P. A. and Thomas, J. M.: 1977, A mixed finite method for the second order elliptic problems, In: I. Galligani and E. Magenes (eds), Mathematical Aspects of the Finite Element Methods Lecture Notes in Math. 606, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 292-315.
20. Reeves, M., Ward, D. S., Johns, N. D. and Cranwell, R. M.: 1986, Theory and implementation of SWIFT II, the Sandia waste-isolation flow and transport model for fractured media, Rep. SAND83-1159, Sandia Natl. Lab., Albuquerque, N.M.
21. Sauter, F.: 1987, User' manual METROPOL, mathematical description, Rep. 728514002, Rijksinst, voor Volksgezondh. en Milieuhyg., Bilthoven, Netherlands.
22. Siegel, P., Mosé, R., Ackerer, Ph. and Jaffré, J.: 1997, Solution of the advection dispersion equation using a combination of discontinuous and mixed finite elements, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 24, 595-613.
23. Voss, C. I.: 1984, A finite element simulation model for saturated-unsaturated fluid-density-dependent ground-water flow with energy transport or chemically-reactive single species solute transport, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Inv., 84-4379, p. 409.