Role of mature leaves in inhibition of root bud growth in Euphorbia esula L.

Weed Science

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 544-550

  Horvath, David P ^a  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auxin; Correlative inhibition; EPHES; Gibberellic acid

Indexed keywords

BIOTIC FACTOR; BUDBURST; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GROWTH; INHIBITOR; ROOT;

EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIA ESULA;

EID: 0032796738     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500092249     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Budd, T. W. 1973. An excellent source of vegetative buds for use in plant hormone studies on apical dominance. Plant Physiol. 52:82-83.
2. Cline, M. G. 1991. Apical dominance. Bot. Rev. 57:318-358.
3. Coupland, R. T., G. W. Selleck, and J. F. Alex. 1955. Distribution of vegetative buds on the underground parts of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.). Can. J. Agric. Sci. 34:161-167.
4. Champagnat, P. 1955. Les correlations entre feuilles et bourgeons de la pousse herbacée du lilas. Rev. Gen. Bot. 62:325-371.
5. Dostal, R. 1909. Korrelationsbeziehung zwiscen dem Blatt und seiner Axillaryknopse. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 27:547.
6. Galitz, D. S. 1994. The biology of leafy spurge. Pages 57-62 in Proceedings of the Leafy Spurge Strategic Planning Workshop, March 29-30. Dickinson, ND: National Park Service.
7. Horvath, D. P. 1998. The role of specific plant organs and polar auxin transport in correlative inhibition of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) root buds. Can. J. Bot. 76:1-5.
8. Jang, J-C., P. Leon, L. Zhou, and J. Sheen. 1997. Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. Plant Cell 9:5-19.
9. Leopold, A. C. and P. E. Kriedermann. 1975. Plant Growth and Development. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 137 p.
10. McIlrath, W. J. and L. Bogorad. 1960. The control of axillary bud growth in Xanthium. Plant Physiol. 35(Suppl.):19-20.
11. McIntyre, G. I. 1971. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula. The influence of the nitrogen supply on correlative inhibition of root bud activity. Can. J. Bot. 50:949-956.
12. McIntyre, G. I. 1979. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula. Evidence of competition for water as a factor in the mechanism of root bud inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 57:2572-2581.
13. McIntyre, G. I. and A. I. Hsiao. 1990. The role of expanded leaves in the correlative inhibition of axillary buds in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Can. J. Bot. 68:1280-1285.
14. Metzger, J. D. 1994. Evidence that sucrose is the shoot-derived signal responsible for the correlative inhibition of root bud growth in leafy spurge. Plant Physiol. 105:S97.
15. Mitchell, J. W. and G. A. Livingston. 1968. Methods of Studying Plant Hormones and Growth-Regulating Substances. USDA-ARS Agricultural Handbook No. 336. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 13 p.
16. Nissen, S. J. and M. E. Foley. 1987. Correlative inhibition in root buds of leafy spurge. Weed Sci. 35:155-159.
17. Noble, D. L., P. H. Dunn, and L. A. Andres. 1979. The leafy spurge problem. Pages 8-15 in Proceedings of the Leafy Spurge Symposium. Fargo, ND: North Dakota Cooperative Extension Service.
18. Perata, P., C. Matsukura, P. Vernieri, and J. Yamaguchi. 1997. Sugar repression of a gibberellin-dependant signaling pathway in barley embryos. Plant Cell 9:2197-2208.
19. Soni, R., J. P. Carmichael, Z. H. Shah, and J. A. Murray. 1995. A family of cyclin D homologues from plants differentially controlled by growth regulators and containing the conserved retinoblastoma protein interaction motif. Plant Cell 7:85-103.
20. Steel, R.G.D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 130 p.
21. Zieslin, N. and A. H. Halevy. 1976. Components of axillary bud inhibition in rose plants. I. The effects of different plant parts (correlative inhibition). Bot. Gaz. 137:291-296.