|
Volumn 106, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1307-1310
|
Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY;
CLASSIFICATION;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
FETUS;
FETUS OUTCOME;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
HEART RATE, FETAL;
HUMANS;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY OUTCOME;
PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD;
PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK;
RANDOM ALLOCATION;
|
EID: 0032794990
PISSN: 14700328
EISSN: 14710528
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08187.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (144)
|
References (8)
|