Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats

Research in Veterinary Science

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 73-82

  Agut, A ^a   Murciano, J ^a   Sanchez Valverde, M A ^a   Laredo, E G ^a   Tovar, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FELIS CATUS; ANIMALIA;

IOHEXOL; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE; MONOMERIC NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BREATHING DISORDER; BREATHING RATE; CAT; FEMALE; HEMATOLOGY; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PULSE RATE; TACHYCARDIA; URINALYSIS; URINE OSMOLALITY; VOMITING;

ANIMALS; CATS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; IOHEXOL; MALE; URETER; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 0032793729     PISSN: 00345288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/rvsc.1997.0289     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ACKERMAN, N. (1991) Radiology and ultrasound of urogenital diseases in dogs and cats. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, pp 6-15.
2. BURK, R.L. & ACKERMAN, N. (1996) The Abdomen. In Small animal radiology and ultrasonography. A diagnostic atlas and text. 2nd edn. Ed. R.L. Bark, N. Ackerman. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, pp 215-125.
3. BUSH, B.M. (1991) Interpretation of laboratory results for small animal clinicians. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. 136-137.
4. BUYAN, N. ARAB, M., HASANOGLU, E., GOKCORA, N. & ERCAN, S. (1995). The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents. Turkey Journal Pediatric 37, 305-313.
5. CARR, A.P., REED, A.L. & POPE, E.R. (1994) Persistent nephrogram in a cat after intravenous urography. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 35, 350-354.
6. COLTHURST, J.R., CHAN, O., CREACH, M., GORDON, R, GUY, R. & MUNCEY, F. (1990) A double-blind clinical study comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of ioversol and iohexol in intravenous urography. Clinical Radiology 42, 174-176.
7. DAWSON, P. (1990) Intravenous urography revisited. British Journal of Urology 66, 561-567.
8. DENNIS, R. & HERRTAGE, M.E. (1989) Low osmolar contrast media: a review. Veterinary Radiology 30, 2-12.
9. EKELUND, L. (1983) Iohexol in urography. Acta Radiologica 366 (Supp). 25-29.
10. FEENEY, D.A., THRALL, D.E., BARBER, D.L., CULVER, D.H. & LEWIS, R.E. (1979) Normal canine excretory urogram: effects of dose, time and individual dog variation. American Journal of Veterinary Research 40, 1596-1604.
11. FEENEY, D.A., OSBORNE C.A. & JESSEN, CR. (1980) Effects of radiographic contrast media on results of urinalysis, with emphasis on alteration in specific gravity. Journal American Veterinary Medical Association 176, 1378-1381.
12. FEENEY, D.A., BARBER, D.L. & OSBORNE, C.A. (1982) The functional aspects of the nephrogram in excretory urography: a review. Veterinary Radiology 23, 42-45.
13. GAVANT, M.L., ELLIS, J.V. & KLESGES, L.M. (1992a) Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media. Radiology 182, 657-660.
14. GAVANT, M.L., ELLIS, J.V. & KLESGES, L.M. (1992b) Maximizing opacification during excretory urography: effect of low-osmolarity contrast media. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 43, 111-115.
15. GAVANT, M.L. (1993) Low-osmolar contrast media in the 1990s. Guidelines for urography in a cost-sensitive environment. Investigative Radiology 28 (Suppl). 13-19.
16. GOLDBERG, S.N., ABRAHAMS, J., DRAYER, B.P., GOLDING, S., BERNARDINO, M. & BRUNETTI, J. (1994) A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Investigative Radiology 29 (Supp 1), 76-83.
17. IHLE, S.L. & KOSTOLICH, M. (1991) Acute renal failure associated with contrast medium administration in a dog. Journal American Veterinary Medical Association 199, 899-901.
18. JACOBSSON, B.F., JORULF, H., KALANTAR, M.S. & NARASIMHAN, D.L. (1988) Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 000 consecutive patients. Radiology 167, 601-605.
19. KAYE, B., HOWARD, J. FOORD, K.D. & CUMBERLAND, D.C. (1988) Comparison of the image quality of intravenous urograms using low-osmolar contrast media. The British Journal of Radiology 61, 589-591.
20. LAWTON, G., PHILLIPS, T. & DAVIES, R. (1982) Alterations in heart rate and rhythm at urography with sodium diatrizoate. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis 23, 107-111.
21. LEVORSTAD, K., KOLBENSTVEDT, A. & LOYNING, E.W. (1983) Iohexol compared with metrizoate in urography. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis 24, 337-342.
22. MEYER, D.J., COLES, Eh. & RICH, L.J. (1992) Veterinary laboratory medicine. Interpretation and diagnosis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, pp 31-38.
23. NEWHOUSE, J.H., LANDMAN, J., LANG, E., AMIS, E.S., GOLMAN, S., KHAZAN, R., LEDER, R. & HEDGCOCK, M. (1994) Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography. Investigative Radiology 29 (Supp 1), 68-73.
24. PUGH, C.R. RHODES, W.H. & BIERY, D.N. (1993) Contrast studies of the urogenital system. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 23, 281-306.
25. SMITH, C., ARBOGAST, C. & PHILLIPS, R. (1983) Effect of X-ray contrast media on results for relative density of urine. Clinical Chemistry 29, 730-731.
26. SPATARO, R.F. KARZBERG, R.W., FISCHER, H.W. & McMANNIS, M.J. (1987) High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: compar son with a conventional contrast agent. Radiology 162, 9-14.
27. SPATARO, R.F. (1988) New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography. Urology Radiology 10, 2-5.
28. WALTER, P.A., FEENEY, D.A. & JOHNSTON, G.R. (1989) Diagnosis and treatment of adverse reactions to radiopaque contrast agents. In Current veterinary therapy X. Ed. R.W. Kirk. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company. pp 47-52.
29. WINFIELD, A.C., DRAY, R.J., KIRCHNER, F.K., MUHLETALER, C.A. & PRICE, R.R. (1983) Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study. American Journal Roentgenol 141, 571-573.