The safety and quality of open registers and a new approach for classifying risky ships

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 135-143

  Li, K X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM; SAFETY; SHIPPING;

EID: 0032792639     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1366-5545(99)00002-2     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cashman, J.P., 1977. Analysis of world merchant ship losses 1967-1975, paper no. 2 in Safety At Sea, Proceedings, London, 23-27 May.
2. Doganis, R.S., Metacxas, B.N., 1976a. The impact of flags of convenience. Polytechnic of Central London and Ealing Technical College, London, pp. 137.
3. Doganies and Metacxas, 1976b. The impact of flags of convenience. Polytechnic of Central London and Ealing Technical College, London, p. 97.
4. ICJ Rep. (1960). pp. 160-170.
5. Li, K.X., Wonham, J., 1999a. New developments in ship registration. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 14 (1), pp. 128-144.
6. Li K.X., Wonham J. New developments in ship registration. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 14(1):1998;142.
7. Li, K.X., Wonham, J., 1999c. Who is safe and who is at risk: a study of 20-year-record on accidental loss in different flags. The Maritime Policy and Management, 1999 Forthcoming issue. pp. 1-8.
8. OECD (1993). Maritime transport 1992, p. 20.
9. Rochdale Report, 1970. Report of Committee of Inquiry into Shipping. London, HMSO.
10. Telegraph Special report, 1998. Flags of convenience. August 1998, pp. 14-15.
11. UNCTAD (1997). Review of Maritime Transport 1997: Report by the UNCTAD Secretariat. Table 17, in p. 30.