Localized graft incompatibility in pear/quince (Pyrus communis/Cydonia oblonga) combinations: Multivariate analysis of histological data from 5-month-old grafts

Tree Physiology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 645-654

  Ermel, F F ^a   Kervella, J ^a   Catesson, A M ^b   Poessel J L ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Bark discontinuity; Cambial dysfunction; Histology; Starch accumulation

Indexed keywords

CELL DEATH; GRAFT HYBRIDIZATION; GRAFT INCOMPATIBILITY; HISTOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

CYDONIA OBLONGA; PYRUS COMMUNIS;

EID: 0032792312     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/19.10.645     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Benzécri, J.P. and F. Benzécri. 1980. Pratique de l'analyse des données. Tome 1: Analyse des correspondances. Exposé élémentaire. Dunod, Paris, 432 p.
2. Biggs, A.R. 1986. Phellogen regeneration in injured peach tree bark. Ann. Bot. 57:463-470.
3. Brian, C. and M. Duron. 1971. Contribution à l'étude de l'incompatibilité au greffage des combinaisons poirier-cognassier. I. Etude du processus d'union sur du matériel herbacé. Ann. Amélior. Plant. 21:445-463.
4. Brossier, J. 1965. La sélection de porte-greffes du poirier dans les populations naturelles de cognassier. II. Sélection de cognassiers porte-greffes du poirier. Ann. Amélior. Plant. 15:73-403.
5. Browning, G. and R. Watkins. 1991. Preliminary evaluation of new quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller) hybrid rootstocks for pear. J. Hortic. Sci. 66:35-42.
6. Copes, D. 1970. Initiation and development of graft incompatibility symptoms in Douglas fir. Silvae Genet. 19:101-107.
7. Copes, D. 1980. Anatomical symptoms of graft incompatibility in Pinus monticola and P. ponderosa. Silvae Genet. 29:77-82.
8. Duquesne, J. 1969. Etude dela compatibilité de greffe de quelques cultivars de Prunus armeniaca (Koehne) sur divers types de Prunus. 1. Compatibilité des cultivars "Canino" et "Rouge du Roussillon" sur divers clones de Prunus cerasifera (Ehrh.) et hybrides interspécifiques. Ann. Amélior. Plant. 19:419-441.
9. Ermel, F.F., J.L. Poëssel, M. Faurobert and A.M. Catesson. 1997. Early scion/stock junction in compatible and incompatible pear/pear and pear/quince grafts: a histo-cytological study. Ann. Bot. 79:505-515.
10. Ermel-Fontaine, F. 1994. Etude de l'incompatibilité de greffe chez les arbres fruitiers: analyse histo-cytologique de l'incompatibilité localisée chez le poirier (Pyrus communis L.) et l'abricotier (Prunus armeniaca L.). Thèse de l'Université Paris 6, Tome 1 142 p, Tome 2 140 p.
11. Errea, P., A. Felipe and M. Herrero. 1994a. Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus spp. J. Exp. Bot. 45:393-401.
12. Errea, P., A. Felipe, D. Treutter and W. Feucht. 1994b. Flavanol accumulation in apricot grafts as a response to incompatibility stress. Acta Hortic. 381:498-501.
13. Garner, R.G. 1958. The grafter's handbook. Faber and Faber, London, 260 p.
14. Greenacre, M.J. 1984. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, London, 364 p.
15. Gur, A. and R.M. Samish. 1965. The relation between growth curves, carbohydrate distribution and compatibility of pear trees grafted on quince rootstocks. Hortic. Res. 5:81-100.
16. Herrero, J. 1951. Studies of compatible and incompatible graft combinations with special reference to hardy fruit trees. J. Hortic. Sci. 26:186-237.
17. Herrero, J. 1968. Manifestations physiques et histologiques de l'incompatibilité. Table ronde sur les problèmes d'incompatibilité lors du greffage de plants ligneux. Séminaires d'horticulture scientifique, Gembloux, pp 7-24.
18. Lapins, K. 1959. Some symptoms of stock-scion incompatibility of apricot varieties on peach seedling rootstock. Can. J. Plant Sci. 39:194-203.
19. Lev-Yadun, S. and R. Aloni. 1990. Vascular differentiation in branch junction of trees: circular patterns and functional significance. Trees 4:49-54.
20. Lombard, P.B. and M.N. Westwood. 1987. Pear rootstocks. In Rootstocks for Fruit Crops. Eds. R.C. Rom and R.F. Carlson. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp 145-183.
21. Moing, A. and J.P. Carde. 1988. Growth, cambial activity and phloem structure in compatible and incompatible peach/plum grafts. Plant Physiol. 79:540-546.
22. Moing, A. and J.P. Gaudillère. 1992. Carbon and nitrogen partitioning in peach/plum grafts. Tree Physiol. 10:81-92.
23. Mosse, B. 1958. Further observations on growth and union structure of double-grafted pear on quince. J. Hortic. Sci. 33:186-193.
24. Mosse, B. 1962. Graft incompatibility in fruit trees. Technical Communication No. 28, Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture and Plantation Crops, East Mailing, Maidstone, Kent, U.K., 36 p.
25. Mosse, B. and F. Scaramuzzi. 1956. Observations on the nature and development of structural defects in the unions between pear and quince. J. Hortic. Sci. 31:47-54.
26. Mueller, W.C. and A.D. Greenwood. 1978. The ultrastructure of phenolic cells fixed with caffeine. J. Exp. Bot. 29:757-764.
27. Mullick, D.B. 1977. The non-specific nature of defence in bark and wood during wounding, insect and pathogen attack. In Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Vol. 11. Eds. F.A. Loewus and V.C. Runeckles. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, pp 395-441.
28. Noel, A.R.A. 1968. Callus formation and differentiation at an exposed cambial surface. Ann. Bot. 32:347-359.
29. O'Brien, T.P., N. Feder and M.E. McCully. 1965. Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by Toluidine Blue O. Protoplasma 59:367-373.
30. Proebsting, E.L. 1928. Further observations on structural defects of the graft union. Bot. Gaz. 86:82-92.
31. Rachow-Brandt, G. and R. Kollmann. 1992. Studies on graft unions. IV. Assimilate transport and sieve element restitution in homo- and heterografts. J. Plant Physiol. 139:579-583.
32. Schöning, U. and R. Kollmann. 1997. Phloem translocation in regenerating in vitro heterografts of different compatibility. J. Exp. Bot. 48:289-295.
33. Shigo, A.L. 1985. How tree branches are attached to trunks. Can. J. Bot. 63:1391-1401.
34. Soumelidou, K., N.H. Battey, P. John and J.R. Barnett. 1994. The anatomy of the developing bud union and its relationship to dwarfing in apple. Ann. Bot. 74:605-611.