Cooperation vs. competition in a spatial model

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 463-472

  Mai, Chao Cheng ^a,b   Peng, Shin Kun ^c  

^a ACADEMIA SINICA   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG HUA INSTITUTION FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

^c INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL AGGLOMERATION; INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032791392     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-0462(99)00007-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. Real effects of academic research: Comment. American Economic Review. 82:1992;363-367.
2. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics. 76:1994;336-340.
3. Angel D.P. High-technology agglomeration and the labor market: The case of Silicon Valley. Environment and Planning A. 23:1991;1501-1516.
4. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. R&D Spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review. 86:1996;630-640.
5. D'Aspremont C., Gabzewicz J., Thisse J.-F. On Hotelling's stability in competition. Econometrica. 47:1979;1145-1150.
6. Feldman M.P. Knowledge complementarity and innovation. Small Business Economics. 6:1994;363-372.
7. Feldman M.P. The Geography of Innovation. 1994;Kluwer Academic, Boston.
8. Friedman J.M., Thisse J.-F. Partial collusion fosters minimum product differentiation. Rand Journal of Economics. 24:1993;631-645.
9. Fujita M., Thisse J.F. Economics of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 10:1996;339-378.
10. Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Economic Journal. 39:1929;41-57.
11. Jaffe A.B. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review. 79:1989;957-970.
12. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 63:1993;577-598.
13. Jehiel P. Product differentiation and price collusion. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 10:1992;633-643.
14. Neven D. Two stage (perfect) equilibrium in Hotelling's model. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 33:1985;317-325.
15. De Palma A., Ginsburgh V., Papageorgiou Y.Y., Thisse J.-F. The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity. Econometrica. 53:1985;767-781.
16. Rhee B.-D., De Palma A., Fornell C., Thisse J.-F. Restoring the principle of minimum differentiation in product positioning. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 1:1992;475-505.
17. Rogers E., Larsen J. Silicon Valley Fever. 1984;Basic Books, New York.
18. Saxenian A. The urban contradictions of Silicon Valley: Regional growth and the restructuring of the semiconductor industry. Sawers L., Tabb W.K. Sunbelt/Snowbelt: Urban Development and Regional Restructuring. 1984;163-197 Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
19. Saxenian A. Contrasting patterns of business organization in Silicon Valley. Environment and Planning D. 10:1992;377-391.
20. Saxenian A. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. 1996;Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
21. Stahl K. Location and spatial pricing theory with nonconvex transportation cost schedules. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 13:1982;575-582.
22. Tabuchi T., Thisse J.-F. Asymmetric equilibria in spatial competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 13:1995;213-227.
23. Zaratiegui J.M. Twin brothers in marshallian thought: Knowledge and organization. Review of Political Economy. 9:1997;295-312.
24. Zhang Z.J. Price-matching policy and the principle of minimum differentiation. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 43:1995;287-299.
25. You J.I., Wilkinson F. Competition and cooperation: Toward understanding industrial district. Review of Political Economy. 6:1994;259-278.