The potential conflict between clinical and judicial decision making heuristics

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 237-248

  Rassin, Eric ^a   Merckelbach, Harald ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LAW; MEMORY; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; REVIEW;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REPRESSION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS DISORDERS, POST-TRAUMATIC; SUGGESTION; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 0032788068     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199904/06)17:2<237::AID-BSL342>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Boeschen, L. E., Sales, B. D., & Koss, M. P. (1998). Rape trauma experts in the courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 414-432.
2. Dalenberg, C. J. (1997). The prediction of accurate recollections of trauma. In J. D. Read & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma: Scientific evidence and clinical practice (pp. 449-453). New York: Plenum.
3. Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31-35.
4. Wagenaar, W. A., Van Koppen, P. J., & Crombag, H. F. M. (1993). Anchored narratives: The psychology of criminal evidence. London: Harvester Press.
5. Wegner, D. M., Quillian, F., & Houston, C. E. (1996). Memories out of order: Thought suppression and the disturbance of sequence memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 680-691.