Speech articulation after subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a myocutaneous flap

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 119, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 621-626

  Knuuttila, Hanna ^a,e   Pukander, Juhani ^b   Määttä, Taisto ^c   Pakarinen, Leenamaija ^d  

^a Department of Finnish and Saaini and Logopedics   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c Department of Otolaryngology and Phoniatrics University of Ontii

^d UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carcinoma; Spectral analysis; Tongue

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSONANT; FEMALE; GLOSSECTOMY; HUMAN; MALE; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; PHONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VOWEL;

EID: 0032787709     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016489950180892     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Finnish cancer registry - Institute for statistical and epidemiodical cancer research: cancer incidence in Finland 1988. Cancer statistics of the National agency for welfare and health. Helsinki: Cancer society of Finland 1991, publ. no. 50.
2. Greven AJ, Meijer MF, Tiwari RM. Articulation after total glossectomy: a clinical study of six patients. Eur J Disord Comm 1994; 29: 85-93.
3. Aimé A-M, Engstrand O, Öberg E. Perceptual judgements of speech following glossectomy. Phonum 1990; 1: 80-3.
4. Krespi YP, Sisson GA. Reconstruction after total or subtotal glossectomy. Am J Surg 1983; 146: 488-92.
5. Logemann JA. Speech and swallowing rehabilitation for head and neck tumor patients. In: Myers EN, Suen JY, eds. Cancer of the head and neck. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1989: 1021-44.
6. Kent RD. Introduction. In: Kent RD, ed. Intelligibility in speech disorders. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1992: 1-10.
7. Bosman LJ, Fabert JMW, Pruyn JFA, et al. Judging speech communication effectiveness in oral cancer patients, J Comm Disord 1991; 24: 40-50.
8. Lieberman P, Blumstein SE. Speech physiology, speech perception, and acoustic phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
9. Korpijaakko-Huuhka A-M, Lehtihalmes M, Söderholm A-L, Juvas A, Jääskeläinen T, Lindqvist, C. Speech defects after oral cancer surgery. Functional and acoustical analyses of retrospective data. In: Elenius K, Branderud P, editors. Proc XHIth Int Cone Phonet Sei, 1995: 508-11.
10. Ptok M, Ptok A, Ehrenfeld M, Mast G, Schmid, Arold R. Frequenzanalytische Untersuchungen der Sprachschallsignale bei Patienten mit Zungen(teil-) resektionen. Sprache Stimme Gehör 1992; 16: 161-7.
11. Fant G. Acoustic theory of speech production. S'Gravenhage: Mouton & Co, 1960.
12. Heller KS~ Levy J, Sciubba JJ. Speech patterns following partial glossectomy for small tumors of the toncue. Head Neck 1991; 13: 340-3.
13. Imai S, Michi K. Articulatory function after resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth: palatometric and perceptual evaluation. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 68-78.
14. Wakumoto M, Ohno K, Imai S, Yamashita Y, Akizuki H, Michi K. Analysis of the articulation after glossectomy - comparison of the direct sutured and reconstructed with forearm flap patients. Paper presented at a joint symposium of the American and Japanese Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, September 1992, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
15. World Health Organisation. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps (ICIDH). Geneva: WHO, 1980.
16. Weismer M, Martin RE. Acoustic and perceptual approaches to the study of intelligibility. Kent RD, editor. Intellisibility in speech disorders. Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins, 1992: 67-118.