Multiagent treatment of agenthood

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 3-10

  Huhns, Michael N ^a   Singh, Munindar P ^b  

^a University of South Carolina   (United States)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0032786347     PISSN: 08839514     EISSN: 10876545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/088395199117469     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Brachman, R. J. 1985. I lied about the trees. AI Magazine 6(3).
2. Erman, L., F. Hayes-Roth, V. R. Lesser, and R. Reddy, 1980. The Hearsay-II speech-understanding system: Integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty. Computing Surveys 12(2):213-253.
3. Franklin, S., and A. Graesser. 1997. Is it an agent or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous agents. In Intelligent agents III: Agent theories, architectures, and languages, 21-35. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Huhns, M. N., and M. P. Singh, ed. 1997. Readings in agents. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Jennings, N. R., and M. J. Wooldridge, eds. 1997. Agent technology: Foundations, applications, markets. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Lesser, V. R., and D. D. Corkill. 1983. The distributed vehicle monitoring testbed: A tool for investigating distributed problem solving networks. AI Magazine 4(3):15-33.
7. Petrie, C. J., Jr. 1996. Agent-based engineering, the Web, and intelligence. IEEE Expert 11(6).
8. Rosenschein, J. S., and G. Zlotkin. 1994. Rules of encounter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Sycara, K. 1997. Warren: Intelligent agents for financial portfolio management. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/softagents/warren
10. Wegner, P. 1997. Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. Communications of the ACM 40(5):80-91.