A comparison of amino acid distance measures using procrustes analysis

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 283-288

  Zintzaras, Elias ^a,c   Kowald, Axel ^b,c  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (Hungary)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amino acid distances; Amino acids similarities; Dayhoff matrix; Rotational fit

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION;

PROCRUSTES;

EID: 0032785381     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4825(99)00014-1     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Dayhoff M.O., Schwartz R.M., Orcutt B.C. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Dayhoff M.O. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. vol. 5:1978;Nat. Biomed. Res. Foundation, Washington, DC. (Suppl. 3).
2. Jones D.T., Taylor W.R., Thorton J.M. Updating the Dayhoff matrix. CABIOS. 8:1992;275-282.
3. Taylor W.R., Jones D.T. Deriving an amino acid distance matrix. Journal of Thoeretical Biology. 164:1993;65-83.
4. Sankoff D., Kruskal J.B. Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: the Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison. 1983;Addison-Wesley.
5. Gower J.C. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika. 40:1975;33-51.
6. Krzanowski W.J. Principles of Multivariate Analysis. Oxford Statistical Science Series-3. 1990;Oxford University Press.
7. Everitt B. Cluster Analysis. 2nd ed. 1980;Heinemann, London.