Ethics consultation: Is it enough to mean well?

HEC Forum

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 208-217

  Aulisio, Mark P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSULTATION; EDUCATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; REVIEW; SKILL; TRAINING;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; CASE STUDIES; ETHICS CONSULTATION; EVALUATION; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; STANDARDS; TECHNICAL EXPERTISE;

CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICISTS; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS COMMITTEES, CLINICAL; ETHICS CONSULTATION; ETHICS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; STAFF DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032781050     PISSN: 09562737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008945430160     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Cranford RE, Doudera EA. The emergence of institutional ethics committees. In: Cranford RE, Doudera EA (eds.) Institutional ethics committees and health care decision making. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1984.
2. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Patients rights and organizational ethics. In: Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals. Chicago, IL:1995. (See also the 1997 Manual: RI-1 to RI-32.)
3. Ross JW, Glaser JW, Rasinski-Gregory D, Gibson JM, Bayley C. Health care ethics committees: The next generation. American Hospital Association: Chicago, IL; 1993.
4. Tulsky JA, Fox E. Evaluating ethics consultation: Framing the questions. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:109-15.
5. Fox E. Concepts in evaluation applied to ethics consultation research. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:116-21.
6. Fox E, Arnold RM. Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:127-38.
7. Fox E, Tulsky JA. Evaluation research and the future of ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:146-49.
8. Tulsky JA, Stocking CB. Obstacles and opportunities in the design of ethics consultation evaluation. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996; 7:139-45.
9. The Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation. Core competencies for health care ethics consultation: The report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics Consultation; 1998.
10. Fletcher JC, Spencer EM. Ethics services in health care organizations. In: Fletcher JC, Lombardo PA, Marshall MF, Miller FG (eds.) Introduction to clinical ethics. 2nd ed., Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group; 1997.
11. rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1989.
12. Aulisio MP. Standards for decision making at the end of life. In: May T, Tudico P (eds.) Advance directives and surrogate decision making in Illinois. Medical Humanities Series. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (forthcoming).
13. Wicclair MR. Patient decision making capacity and risk. Bioethics. 1991;5:91-104.
14. Drane J. The many faces of competency. Hastings Center Report. 1985;15:17-21.
15. Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
16. May T. Re-assessing the reliability of advance directives. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1997; 6:325-38.