Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with bipolar electrocoagulation

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 163-167

  Peterson, Herbert B ^a,b   Xia, Zhisen ^a,b   Wilcox, Lynne S ^a,b   Tylor, Lisa Ratliff ^a,b   Trussell, James ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT FAILURE; UTERINE TUBE COAGULATION; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STERILIZATION, TUBAL;

EID: 0032775607     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00316-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Peterson LS. Contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-90. Advanced data from vital and health statistics. No. 260. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 1995. (DHHS publication no. PHS 95-1250).
2. Peterson H.B., Hulka J.F., Phillips J.M., Surrey M.W. Laparoscopic sterilization American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1991 Membership Survey . J Reprod Med. 38:1993;572-573.
3. Peterson H.B., Xia Z., Hughes J.M., Wilcox L.S., Tylor L.R., Trussell J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization Findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 174:1996;1161-1170.
4. Peterson H.B., Xia Z., Hughes J.M., Wilcox L.S., Tylor L.R., Trussell J. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. N Engl J Med. 336:1997;762-767.
5. Hillis S.D., Marchbanks P.A., Tylor L.R., Peterson H.B. Tubal sterilization and long-term risk of hysterectomy Findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization . Obstet Gynecol. 89:1997;609-614.
6. Hillis S.D., Marchbanks P.A., Tylor L.R., Peterson H.B. Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women Findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization . Obstet Gynecol. 91:1998;241-246.
7. SAS Institute, SAS/STAT Software: Changes and enhancements. Technical report P/229. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, 1992.
8. Corson S.L., Patrick H., Hamilton T., Bolognese R.J. Electrical considerations of laparoscopic sterilization. J Reprod Med. 11:1973;159-164.
9. Rioux J.E., Cloutier D. A new bipolar instrument for laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 119:1974;737-739.
10. Kleppinger R.K. Ancillary uses of bipolar forceps. J Reprod Med. 18:1977;254-256.
11. Soderstrom R.M. Sterilization failures and their causes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 152:1985;395-403.
12. Soderstrom R.M., Levy B.S. Bipolar systems - do they perform? Obstet Gynecol. 69:1987;425-426.
13. Soderstrom R.M., Levy B.S., Engel T. Reducing bipolar sterilization failures. Obstet Gynecol. 74:1989;60-63.
14. Tucker R.D., Benda J.A., Mardan A., Engel T. The interaction of electrosurgical bipolar forceps and generators on an animal model of fallopian tube sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 165:1991;443-449.
15. Gunston K.D., van Coeverden de Groot H.A., Goldberg G.L., Bromhall M.R. Macroscopic and microscopic changes in the fallopian tube after bipolar cauterization. S Afr Med J. 63:1983;518-519.
16. Ayers J.W.T., Johnson R.S., Ansbacher R., Menon M., LaFerla J.J., Roberts J.A. Sterilization failures with bipolar tubal cautery. Fertil Steril. 42:1984;526-530.