Loblolly - The pine for the twenty-first century

New Forests

Volumn 17, Issue 1-3, 1999, Pages 71-88

  Schultz, Robert P ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest health; Growth and yield; Multiple use management; Pine plantations; Sustainability; Tree improvement

Indexed keywords

FOREST RESOURCE; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; FUTURE PROSPECT;

UNITED STATES;

INSECTA; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0032770706     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006533212151     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Abbott, H.G. and Fitch, S.D. 1977. Forest nursery practices in the United States. J. For. 75: 141-145.
2. Alig, R.J., Knight, H.A. and Birdsey, R.A. 1986. Recent Area Changes in Southern Forest Ownerships and Cover Types. Research Paper SE-260. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC.
3. Balmer, W.E., Utz, K.A. and Langdon, O.G. 1978. Financial returns from cultural work in natural loblolly pine stands. South. J. Appl. For. 2(4): 111-117.
4. Berry, C.R. and Marx, D.H. 1976. Sewage sludge and Pisolithus tinctorius ectomycorrhizae: Their effect on growth of pine seedlings. For. Sci. 22(3): 351-358.
5. Birdsey, R.A. and Pitcher, J.A. 1986. Management options for poorly stocked stands in the south central United States. South. J. Appl. For. 10(2): 73-77.
6. Burton, J.D. and Tiarks, A.E. 1986. Available nutrients and early growth of woody plants vary with overburden material in lignite minesoils of Louisiana, pp. 79-85. In: Proceedings of the National Meeting of the American Society of Surface Mining and Reclamation. American Society for Surface Mining and Reclamation, Princeton, WV.
7. Busby, R.L. 1989. Economic returns using sulfometuron methyl (Oust) for herbaceous weed control in southern pine plantations, pp. 359-364. In: Proceedings, 5th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, 1988. Memphis, TN. Gen. Tech Rep. SO-74. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA.
8. Foster, B.B. 1982. Taxpayers gain from southern pine regeneration programs. South. J. Appl. For. 6(4): 188-193.
9. Franklin, E.C. 1985. How to manage your woodlands profitably. For. Farm. 44(5): 14-15.
10. Gilmore, A.R. and Funk, D.T. 1976. Shortleaf and loblolly pine seed origin trails in southern Illinois: 27-year results, pp. 115-124. In: Proceedings of the 10th Central States Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
11. Goebel, N.B. 1974. Growth and yield of planted loblolly pine. In: Proceedings, Symposium on Management of Young Pines 1974 October 22-24; Alexandria, LA/December 3-5, Charleston, SC, Asheville, NC; USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station 264-275.
12. Han, Y.C., Hong, S.H., Sohn, S.I., Ahn, J.K. and Byoun, K.O. 1987a. Studies on late growth performance of Pinus rigida x Pinus taeda. Res. Rep. Inst. For. Genet., Korea Republic 23: 11-15.
13. Han, Y.C., Lee, K.Y., Choi, S.K., Ryu, K.O., Chang, S.O., Song, H.U., Noh, C.C., Chang, S.K., Kim, K.S. and Youn, K.S. 1987b. Growth performance of 24-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in five locations. Rep. Inst. For. Genet., Korea Republic 23: 96-100.
14. Hull IV, B.R. and Buhyoff, G.J. 1986. The scenic beauty temporal distribution method: An attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts. For. Sci. 32(2): 271-286.
15. Hyun, S.K. 1972. The possibility of F utilization in pine hybridization, pp. 1-10. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO genetics-SABRAO Joint Symposia. Government Forest Experiment Station, Tokyo, Japan.
16. Hyun, S.K. 1974. Pine hybridization and performance of hybrids in Korea. Indian J. Genet. 34A: 375-386.
17. Hyun, S.K. and Ahn, K. Y. 1959. Principal characteristics of x Pinus rigitaeda. Res. Rep. Inst. For. Genet., Korea Republic 1: 35-40.
18. Kline, W.N. and Kidd, F.A. 1986. Economics of brush control in loblolly pine plantations, pp. 324-334. In: Weed Science and Risk Assessment: Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society 39th Annual Meeting. Southern Weed Science Society, Champaign, IL.
19. Lantz, C.W. 1988. Overview of southern regeneration, pp. 1-7. In: Proceedings of the 1988 Southern Forest Nursery Association. Southern Forest Nursery Association, Charleston, SC.
20. Maki, T.E. 1964. From poverty grass to pine timber. Res. Farm. 23(1): 4-5.
21. Maki, T.E. and Allen II, L.H. 1978. Turbulence characteristics of a single line pine tree windbreak, pp. 81-92. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida. Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
22. Mann, W.R., Jr. 1969. Techniques and progress in regenerating southern pines. For. Prod. J. 19(8): 10-16.
23. McNeel, J.F. and Stuart, W.B. 1984. Feasibility of Agri-Silviculture for Pine Plantations in the South. Paper 84-1609. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
24. Meyer, R.D., Klemperer, W.D. and Siegel, W.C. 1986. Cutting contracts and timberland leasing. J. For. 84(12): 35-38.
25. Rosson, J.F., Jr. and Doolittle, L. 1987. Profiles of Mid-South Nonindustrial Private Forests and Owners. Resource Bulletin SO-125. Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, New Orleans, LA.
26. Rudis, V.A., Rosson, J.F. and Kelly, J.F. 1984. Forest Resources of Alabama. Resource Bulleton SO-98. Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, New Orleans, LA.
27. Schreiner, H.G. and Baggio, A.J. 1984. Intercropping of corn (Zea mays L.) with Pinus taeda L. planted stands located in Southern Parana, Brazil. Boletin de Pesquisa Florestal, Curitiba 8/9: 26-49.
28. Schultz, R.P. 1975. Intensive culture of southern pines: maximum yields on short rotations. Iowa State J. Res. 49(3): 325-337.
29. Sheffield, R.W., Cost, N.E., Bechtold, W.A. and McClure, J.P. 1985. Pine Growth Reductions in the Southwest. Resource Bulletin SE-83. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC.
30. Smith, D.W. 1989. Industry-sponsored landowner assistance programs. For. Farm. 48(5): 41.
31. Telewski, F.W. 1986. Physiological responses of trees to mechanical perturbation: Implication for genetic evaluation for wind tolerance, pp. 251-252. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Windbreak Technology. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 117. Cooperative Extension Service, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
32. Wahlenberg, W.G. 1960. Loblolly Pine: Its use, Ecology, Regeneration, Protection, Growth and Management. School of Forestry, Duke University, Durham, NC. 603 p.
33. Williams, T.M. and Gresham, C.A. 1986. Factors important to loblolly pine productivity on the southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States, pp. 177-186. In: Agren, G.I. (Ed) Predicting Consequences of Intensive Forest Harvesting on Long-Term Productivity. Report 26. Institutiionen for Ekologi och Miljovard, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
34. Williston, H.L. 1988. The Yazoo-Little Tallahatchie Flood Prevention Project: A history of the Forest Service's role. Forestry Report R8-FR 8. Southern Region, USDA Forest Service, Atlanta, GA. 63 p.