Contracting knowledge: The organizational limits to interdisciplinary energy efficiency research and development in the US and the UK

Energy Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 217-227

  Lutzenhiser, Loren ^a   Shove, Elizabeth ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Energy R and D; Organizational contexts; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

CONTRACTS; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

ENERGY CONSERVATION; INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032767350     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00012-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bimber, B., Guston, D.H., 1995. Politics by the same means: government and science in the United States. In: Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
2. Blumstein, C., Goldstone, S., Lutzenhiser, L., 1998. A theory-based approach to market transformation. Proceedings of the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, pp. 7.21-7.32.
3. Bijker W., Hughes T.P., Pinch T. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology:1987;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Bijker W., Law J. Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change:1992;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Clark N. The Political Economy of Science and Technology. 1985;Blackwell, Oxford.
6. de Solla Price D.J. Little Science, Big Science. 1963;Columbia University Press, New York.
7. du Pont, P., (1998). Energy policy and consumer reality: the role of energy in the purchase of appliances in the U.S. and Thailand. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware.
8. Geller, H., Nadel, S., 1994. Market transformation strategies to promote end-use efficiency, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 19, 301-346.
9. Gibbons M.et al. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies:1994;Sage, London.
10. Haas P. Saving the Mediterranean. 1990;Columbia University Press, New York.
11. HMSO, 1993. Realizing Our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology. Her Majesty's Stationery Office CM2250.
12. Hoffman, M., Keating, K., 1998. Introduction to Volume 7: Market Transformation, Proceedings of the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, pp. 7.xi-7.xii.
13. Kempton W., Montgomery L. Folk quantification of energy. Energy. 7:1982;817-827.
14. Lea F. Science and Building. A History of the Building Research Station:1971;HMSO, London.
15. Ling, R., Wilhite, H., 1992. An ethnographic examination of the role of energy efficiency in the sale and purchase of large household appliances in Scandinavia. Proceedings of the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, pp. 10.111-10.121.
16. Lutzenhiser L. A cultural model of household energy consumption. Energy- The International Journal. 17:1992;47-60.
17. Lutzenhiser L. Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 18:1993;247-289.
18. Lutzenhiser L. Sociology, energy and interdisciplinary environmental science. The American Sociologist. 25:1994;57-78.
19. Lutzenhiser L., Harris C., Olsen M. Energy, environment and technology. Dunlap R., Michaelson W. Handbook of Environmental Sociology. 1999;Greenwood Press, New York. in press.
20. Lutzenhiser, L., Kunkle, R., Woolsey Biggart, N., Hackett, B., 1998. New commercial buildings: market transformation research needs. A Report to the California Institute for Energy Efficiency. Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
21. Mulkay N. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. 1979;George Allen and Unwin, London.
22. National Research Council Stern P.C., Aronson E. Energy Use. The Human Dimension:1984;National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
23. National Research Council Stern P.C., Young O.R., Druckman D. Global Environmental Change. Understanding the Human Dimensions:1992;National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
24. National Research Council Stern P.C., Dietz T., Ruttan V., Socolow R., Sweeney Environmentally Significant Consumption. Research Directions:1997;J. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
25. Newman D.K., Day D. The American Energy Consumer. 1975;Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
26. Rothschild, Lord., (1971). The organization and management of government R&D. Framework for Government Research and Development. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Command Paper 4814.
27. Schipper L., Bartlett S., Hawk D., Vine E. Linking lifestyles to energy use. a matter of time? Annual Review of Energy. 14:1989;273-318.
28. Shove E. Revealing the invisible. Woodgate G., Redclift M. International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. 1997;261-273 Edward Elgar, London.
29. Shove E., Lutzenhiser L., Guy S., Hackett B., Wilhite H. Energy and social systems. Rayner S., Malon E. Human Choice and Climate Change. 1998;201-234 Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
30. Smith B. American Science Since World War II. 1990;Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
31. Stern P.C. Blind spots in policy analysis. What economics does not say about energy use Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 5:1986;200-227.
32. Stern P.C. A second environmental science. human-environment interactions Science. 260:1993;1897-1899.
33. Wilk, R., Wilhite, H., 1984. Why don't people weatherize their homes? an ethnographic explanation, In: Morrison, B.M., Kempton, W., (Eds.), Families and Energy: Coping With Uncertainty, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 449-458.
34. Winward, J., Schiellerup, P., Boardman, B., 1998. Cool Labels: The First Three Years of the European Energy Label. Environmental Change Unit, University of Oxford.