Cerebral organization of motor programming and verbal processing as a function of degree of hand preference and familial sinistrality

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 500-515

  Keane, Anne Maria ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HANDEDNESS; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERBALIZATION;

EID: 0032766621     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1999.1115     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andrews, R. J. 1977. Aspects of language lateralization correlated with familial handedness. Neuropsychologia, 15, 769-778.
2. Ballesteros, S., Manga, D., & Coello, T. 1989. Attentional resources in dual-task performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 425-428.
3. Briggs, G. G., & Nebes, R. D. 1976. The effects of handedness, family history and sex on the performance of a dichotic listening task. Neuropsychologia, 14, 129-133.
4. Bryden, M. P. 1986. Dichotic listening performance, cognitive ability, and cerebral organization. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 445-456.
5. Catlin, J., VanDerveer, N., & Teicher, R. 1976. Monaural right-ear advantage in a target-identification task. Brain and Language, 3, 470-481.
6. Dee, H. L. 1971. Auditory asymmetry and strength of manual preference. Cortex, 7, 236-245.
7. De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., Lodesani, M., & Vecchi, A. 1983. Performance of left brain-damaged patients on imitation of single movements and motor sequences. Frontal and parietal-injured patients compared. Cortex, 19, 333-343.
8. Fischer, R., Alexander, M., Gabriel, C., Gould, E., & Milione, J. 1991. Reversed lateralization of cognitive functions in right handers. Brain, 114, 245-261.
9. Fromm, D., Abbs, J. H., McNeil, M. R., & Rosenbek, J. C. 1982. Simultaneous perceptual-physiological method for studying apraxia of speech. In R. K. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis: BKR.
10. Geffen, G., & Traub, E. 1979. Preferred hand and familial sinistrality in dichotic monitoring. Neuropsychologia, 17, 527-531.
11. Gilbert, C. 1977. Non-verbal perceptual abilities in relation to left-handedness and cerebral lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 15, 779-791.
12. Goodale, M. A. 1988. Hemispheric differences in motor control. Behavioral Brain Research, 30, 203-214.
13. Harrington, D., & Haaland, K. 1992. Motor sequencing with left hemisphere damage. Brain, 115, 857-874.
14. Hicks, R. E. 1975. Intrahemispheric response competition between vocal and unimanual performance in normal adult human males. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 50-60.
15. Ikeda, K. 1987. Lateralized interference effects of concurrent verbal tasks on sequential finger tapping. Neuropsychologia, 25, 453-456.
16. Kallman, H. J. 1977. Ear asymmetries with monaurally-presented sounds. Neuropsychologia, 15, 833-835.
17. Keane, A. M. Determination and degree of handedness: The connection with speech and the contribution of familial sinistrality. [in preparation]
18. Kimura, D. 1977. Acquisition of a motor skill after left-hemisphere damage. Brain, 100, 527-542.
19. Kimura, D. 1982. Left-hemisphere control of oral and brachial movements and their relation to communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: B: Biological Sciences, 298, 135-149.
20. Kimura, D., & Archibald, Y. 1974. Motor functions of the left hemisphere. Brain, 97, 337-350.
21. Kimura, D., & Watson, N. 1989. The relation between oral movement control and speech. Brain and Language, 37, 565-590.
22. Kinsbourne, M., & Hiscock, M. 1983. Asymmetries of dual-task performance. In J. B. Hellige (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Method, theory and application. New York: Praeger.
23. Krutsch, A. J., & McKeever, W. F. 1990. Cross-modal correlation of dichotic and tachistoscopic language laterality tasks: The importance of familial sinistrality. Brain and Language, 38, 384-397.
24. Lawrence, D. G., & Kuypers, H. G. 1968a. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain, 91, 1-14.
25. Lawrence, D. G., & Kuypers, H. G. 1968b. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem pathways. Brain, 91, 15-36.
26. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
27. Lishman, W. A., & McMeekan, E. 1977. Handedness in relation to direction and degree of cerebral dominance for language. Cortex, 13, 30-43.
28. Lomas, J., & Kimura, D. 1976. Intrahemispheric interaction between speaking and sequential manual activity. Neuropsychologia, 14, 23-33.
29. McKeever, W. F. 1986. The influences of handedness, sex, familial sinistrality and androgyny on language laterality, verbal ability, and spatial ability. Cortex, 22, 521-537.
30. Morais, J. 1975. Monaural ear differences for same-different reaction times to speech with prior knowledge of ear stimulated. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 829-830.
31. Morais, J., & Darwin, C. J. 1974. Ear differences for same-different reaction times to monaurally presented speech. Brain and Language, 1, 383-390.
32. Moscovitch, M. 1973. Language and the cerebral hemispheres: Reaction-time studies and their implications for models of cerebral dominance. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T. Alloway, (Eds), Communication and affect: Language and thought. New York: Academic Press.
33. Ojemann, G., & Mateer, C. 1979. Human language cortex: Localization of memory, syntax, and sequential motor-phoneme identification systems. Science, 205, 1401-1403.
34. Oldfield, R. C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
35. Orsini, D. L., Satz, P., Soper, H. V., & Light, R. K. 1985. The role of familial sinistrality in cerebral organization. Neuropsychologia, 23, 223-232.
36. Peters, M. 1990. Interaction of vocal and manual movements. In G. E. Hammond (Ed.), Cerebral control of speech and limb movements. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
37. Piazza, D. M. 1980. The influence of sex and handedness in the hemispheric specialization of verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 18, 163-176.
38. Rapcsak, S., Ochipa, C., Anderson, K., & Poizner, H. 1995. Progressive ideomotor apraxia: Evidence for a selective impairment of the action production system. Brain and Cognition, 27, 213-236.
39. Rastatter, M. P., & Gallaher, A. J. 1982. Reaction-times of normal subjects to monaurally presented verbal and tonal stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 20, 465-473.
40. Roy, E. A., & Square, P. A. 1985. Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal and oral apraxia. In E. A. Roy (Ed.), Advances in Psychology: Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
41. Schwartz, J., & Tallal, P. 1980. Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Science, 207, 1380-1381.
42. Sheehan, E. P., & Smith, H. V. 1986. Cerebral lateralization and handedness and their effects on verbal and spatial reasoning. Neuropsychologia, 24, 531-540.
43. SPSSx 1988. SPSSx User's Guide, 3rd ed. Chicago, Ill: SPSS.
44. Square-Storer, P., & Roy, E. 1989. The apraxias: Commonalities and distinctions. In P. A. Square-Storer (Ed.), Acquired apraxia of speech in aphasic adults. London: Taylor & Francis.
45. Square-Storer, P., Roy, E., & Hogg, S. 1990. The dissociation of aphasia from apraxia of speech, ideomotor limb, and buccofacial apraxia. In G. E. Hammond (Ed.), Cerebral control of speech and limb movements. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
46. Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D. 1970. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 48, 579-594.
47. Summers, J. J., & Sharp, C. A. 1979. Bilateral effects of concurrent verbal and spatial rehearsal on complex motor sequencing. Neuropsychologia, 17, 331-343.
48. Tallal, P. 1983. A precise timing mechanism may underlie a common speech perception and production area in the peri-Sylvian cortex of the dominant hemisphere. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 219-220.
49. Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. 1974. Developmental aphasia: Rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia, 12, 83-93.
50. Umilta, C., Rizzolatti, G., Anzola, G. P., Luppino, G., & Porro, C. 1985. Evidence of interhemispheric transmission in laterality effects. Neuropsychologia, 23, 203-213.
51. Van Strien J. W., & Bouma, A. 1988. Cerebral organization of verbal and motor functions in left-handed and right-handed adults: Effects of concurrent verbal tasks on unimanual tapping performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 139-156.