Use of song types by Mountain Chickadees (Poecile gambeli)

Wilson Bulletin

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 368-375

  Wiebe, Myra O ^a,b   Lein, M Ross ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; PASSERINE; SONG;

CANADA;

POECILE GAMBELI;

EID: 0032766252     PISSN: 00435643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1997. Forty-first supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. Auk 114:542-552.
2. BAKER, M. C., T. H. BJERKE, H. LAMPE, AND Y. ESPMARK. 1986. Sexual response of female Great Tits to variation in size of males' song repertoires. Am. Nat. 128:491-498.
3. BIJNENS, L. AND A. A. DHONDT. 1984. Vocalizations in a Belgian Blue Tit, Parus c. caeruleus, population. Le Gerfaut 74:243-269.
4. 2 test. Pp. 132-156 in Readings in statistics for the behavioral scientist (J. A. Steger, Ed.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
5. DAHLSTEN, D. L. AND W. A. COPPER. 1979. The use of nesting boxes to study the biology of the Mountain Chickadee (Parus gambeli) and its impact on selected forest insects. Pp. 217-260 in The role of insectivorous birds in forest ecosystems (J. G. Dickson, R. N. Conner, R. R. Fleet, J. C. Kroll, and J. A. Jackson. Eds.). Academic Press, New York.
6. DIXON, K. L. AND D. J. MARTIN. 1979. Notes on the vocalization of the Mexican Chickadee. Condor 81:421-423.
7. DODSON, D. W. AND R. E. LEMON. 1975. Re-examination of monotony threshold hypothesis in bird song. Nature 257:126-128.
8. GADDIS, P. K. 1983. Differential usage of song types by Plain, Bridled and Tufted titmice. Ornis Scand. 14:16-23.
9. GADDIS, P. K. 1985. Structure and variability in the vocal repertoire of the Mountain Chickadee. Wilson Bull. 97:30-46.
10. HAILMAN, J. P. 1989. The organization of major vocalizations in the Paridae. Wilson Bull. 101:305-343.
11. HILL, B. G. 1987. Territorial behaviour and ecological relations of sympatric Black-capped (Parus atricapillus) and Mountain chickadees (Parus gambell) in southwestern Alberta. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
12. HILL, B. G. AND M. R. LEIN. 1987. Function of frequency-shifted songs of Black-capped Chickadees. Condor 89:914-915.
13. HILL, B. G. AND M. R. LEIN. 1989. Natural and simulated encounters between sympatric Black-capped Chickadees and Mountain chickadees. Auk 106:645-652.
14. HINDE, R. A. 1952. The behaviour of the Great Tit (Parus major) and some related species. Behaviour, Suppl. 2:1-201.
15. JOHNSON, L. S. 1987. Pattern of song types use for territorial defense in the Plain Titmouse Parus inornatus. Omis Scand. 18:24-32.
16. KREBS, J. R. 1976. Habituation and song repertoires in the Great Tit. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1:297-303.
17. KREBS, J. R. 1977. The significance of song repertoires: the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 25:475-478.
18. KREBS, J. R. AND D. E. KROODSMA. 1980. Repertoires and geographical variation in bird song. Adv. Study Behav. 11:143-177.
19. KROODSMA, D. E. 1982. Song repertoires: problems in their definition and use. Pp. 125-146 in Acoustic communication in birds. Vol. 2. Song learning and its consequences (D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, Eds.). Academic Press, New York.
20. KROODSMA, D. E. AND B. E. BYERS. 1991. The function(s) of bird song. Am. Zool. 31:318-328.
21. LAMBRECHTS, M. AND A. A. DHONDT. 1988. The anti-exhaustion hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the Great Tit. Anim. Behav. 36:327-334.
22. LEIN, M. R. 1978. Song variation in a population of Chestnut-sided Warblers (Dendroica pensylvanica): its nature and suggested significance. Can. J. Zool. 56:1266-1283.
23. MACDOUGALL-SHACKLETON, S. A. 1998. Sexual selection and the evolution of song repertoires. Curr. Ornithol. 14:81-124.
24. MCGREGOR, P. K., J. R. KREBS, AND C. M. PERRINS. 1981. Song repertoires and lifetime reproductive success in the Great Tit (Parus major). Am. Nat. 188:149-159.
25. MORTON, E. S. 1977. On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am. Nat. 111:855-869.
26. NELSON, D. A. AND L. J. CRONER. 1991. Song categories and their functions in the Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Auk 108:42-52.
27. RATCLIFFE, L. AND R. G. WEISMAN. 1985. Frequency shift in the fee bee song of the Black-capped Chickadee (Parus atricapillus). Condor 87:555-556.
28. RATCLIFFE, L. AND R. G. WEISMAN. 1986. Song sequence discrimination in the Black-capped Chickadee (Parus atricapillus). J. Comp. Psychol. 100: 361-367.
29. SCHROEDER, D. J. AND R. H. WILEY. 1983. Communication with repertoires of song themes in Tufted Titmice. Anim. Behav. 31:1128-1138.
30. SEARCY, W. A. 1983. Response to multiple song types in male Song Sparrows and Field Sparrows. Anim. Behav. 31:948-949.
31. SMITH, S. T. 1972. Communication and other social behavior in Parus carolinensis. Publ. Nuttall Ornithol. Club 11:1-125.
32. STAICER, C. A. 1989. Characteristics, use, and significance of two singing behaviors in Grace's Warbler (Dendroica graciae). Auk 106:49-63.
33. TEMRIN, H. 1986. Singing behaviour in relation to polyterritorial polygyny in the Wood Warbler (Phylloscopus sibilatrix). Anim. Behav. 34:146-152.
34. WEARY, D. M., R. E. LEMON, AND S. PERREAULT. 1994. Male Yellow Warblers vary use of song types depending on pairing status and distance from the nest. Auk 111:727-729.
35. WEISMAN, R. G. AND L. RATCLIFFE. 1989. Absolute and relative pitch processing in Black-capped Chickadees, Parus atricapillus. Anim. Behav. 38:685-692.
36. WIEBE, M. O. 1995. The function of song types in the Mountain Chickadee (Parus gambeli). M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.