Common pitfalls in the design and operation of membrane plants - Or how I should have done it!

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 10-11, 1999, Pages 107-114

  Bruckaert, C J ^a   Buckley, C A ^a   Jacobs, E P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Design; Operation; Reverse osmosis; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

MEMBRANE EFFLUENT TREATMENT;

EFFLUENT TREATMENT;

CONFERENCE PAPER; EFFLUENT; MEMBRANE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

HARNESS;

EID: 0032766105     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00259-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. Buckley, C. A., Kerr, C. A. and Simpson, A. E. (1992). Small-scale tests to determine the feasibility of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration for the treatment of industrial effluents. Water SA, 18(1), 63-67.
2. Cowan, J. A. C., Mactavish, F., Brouckaert, C. J. and Jacobs, E. P. (1992). Membrane treatment strategies for red meat abattoir effluent. Wat. Sci. Tech., 25(10), 137-148.
3. Jacobs, E. P., Swart, P., Brouckaert, C. J. and Hart, O. O. (1993). Membrane performance restoration. I. Abattoir process streams, cleaning regimes for UF membranes. Water SA, 19(2), 127-132.