Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 802-804

  Ito, Juichi ^a,b   Nakatake, Mitsuko ^a,b   Fujita, Shuji ^a,b  

^a Otsu Red Cross Hospital ^*

^b OTSU RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TELEPHONE; VOWEL;

EID: 0032763606     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a93864     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Dorman MF, Dove H, Parkin J, et al. Telephone use by patients fitted with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1991;12:368-9.
2. Cohen ML, Waltzman SB, Shapiro WH. Telephone speech comprehension with use of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 1989;142:8-11.
3. Lowe RG, Goldstein DP. Acoustic versus inductive coupling of hearing aids to telephones. Ear Hear 1982;3:227-34.
4. Kepler LJ, Terry M, Sweetman RH. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population. Ear Hear 1992;13:311-9.
5. Cashman MZ, Rossman RN, Abel SM. A comparison of three modes of hearing-aid-telephone coupling. J Otolaryngol 1982;11:239-47.
6. Cherry R, Rubinstein A. The effect of telephone intervention on success with amplification. Ear Hear 1994;15:256-61.
7. Ito J, Takagi A, Kawano M, et al. Results with the currently used cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 1995;166:298-300.
8. Ito J. Cochlear implantation: preoperative counseling and postoperative problems. Auris Nasus Larynx 1994;21:98-102.