Support groups for injured workers: Process and outcomes

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1059-1064

  Mignone, Javier ^a,b   Guidotti, Tee L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; HUMAN; MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURY; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; SOMATIZATION; SUPPORT GROUP; WELLBEING; WORKMAN COMPENSATION;

EID: 0032763534     PISSN: 10762752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199912000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Hannah TE, Hannah E, Mosher D, Vardy L. Perceived benefits of a lifestyles modification programme in the rehabilitation of workers' compensation recipients. Can J Publ Health. 1988;79:323-326.
2. Vugia HD. Support groups in oncology: building hope through human bond. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1991;9:89-107.
3. Fabrega H. The concept of somatization as a cultural and historical product of Western medicine. Psychosomatic Med. 1990;52:653-672.
4. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control reinforcements. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80:Whole No:609.
5. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277-299.
6. Main CJ. The modified somatic perception questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosomatic Res. 1983;27:503-514.
7. Main CJ, Waddel GA. comparison of cognitive measures and low back pain: statistical structure and clinical validity at initial assessment. Pain. 1991;46:287-298.
8. Zung WWK. A cross-cultural survey of symptoms in depression. Am J Psychiat. 1969;126:116-121.
9. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1963:47-50.