Potential impact of a change in the diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus on the prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance in a local community at risk of diabetes: Impact of new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 343-346

  Davies, Melanie J ^a   Muehlbayer, S ^a   Garrick, P ^a   McNally, P G ^a  

^a LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Fasting glucose; Oral glucose tolerance test; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; WHO criteria

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE METABOLISM; HUMAN; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; PREVALENCE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASIA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DIABETES MELLITUS; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0032758589     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00056.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1 WHO, Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus. Second Report. Technical Report Series 646 Geneva: WHO, 1980.
2. 2 National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 1979; 28: 1039-1057.
3. 3 World Health Organisation. Study group. Diabetes Mellitus WHO Tech Rep Ser, 1985, no. 727.
4. 4 Report of the Expert Committee of the Diagnosis, Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1183-1197.
5. 5 Alberti KGMM, Zimmer PZ for the WHO Consultation. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabetic Med 1998; 15: 539-553.
6. 6 McCance DR, Hanson RL, Childs MA, Jacobsson LTH, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH et al. Comparison of tests for glycated haemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentration as diagnostic methods for diabetes. Br Med J 1994; 308: 1323-1328.
7. 7 Harris MI, Hadden DR, Knowler WC, Bennett PH. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance and plasma glucose levels in the US population aged 20-74 years Diabetes 1987; 36: 523-534.
8. 8 Finch CF, Zimmet PA, Alberti KGMM. Determining diabetes prevalence: a rational basis for the use of fasting plasma glucose concentrations? Diabetic Med 1990; 7: 603-610.
9. 9 McCarthy D, Zimmet P. Diabetes 1994-2010: global estimates for projection 1994. Melbourne, Australia: International Diabetes Institute. A WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes Mellitus.
10. 10 Amos AF, Mccarty DJ, Zimmet P. The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications. Diabetic Med 1997; 14: S7-S85.
11. 11 Kerr D, Cavan DA, Everett J. Diabetes - what's in a name. Diabetic Med 1998; 15: 619.
12. 12 Harris MI, Eastman RC, Cowie CC, Flegal KM, Eberhardt MS. Comparision of diabetes diagnostic categories in the US population according to 1997 American Diabetes Association and 1980-1985 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1859-1862.
13. 13 Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Latha E, Vijay V. Evaluation of the use of fasting plasma glucose as a new diagnostic criterion for diabetes in Asian Indian population. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 666-667.
14. 14 Shaw JE, de Courten MP, Hodge AM, Zimmet PZ. Can fasting glucose ever be adequate to screen for diabetes? Diabetes 1998; 47: A150.
15. 15 O'Rahilly S, Hattersley A, Vaag A, Gray H. Insulin resistance as the major cause of impaired glucose tolerance: a self fulfilling prophesy? Lancet 1994; 344: 585-89.
16. 16 McKeigue PM, Shah B, Marmot MG. Relation of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South Asians. Lancet 1991; 337: 382-386.
17. 17 DECODE. Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Study Group. Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiological data. Br Med J 1998; 317: 371-375.
18. 18 Unwin N, Alberti KGMM, Bhopal R, Harland J, Watson W, White M. Comparision of the current WHO and new ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in three ethnic groups in the UK Diabetic Med 1998; 15: 554-557.
19. 19 Shaw JE, de Courten MP, Hodge AM, McCarty D, Gareeboo H, Chitson P et al. IGT or IFG for predicting NIDDM. Who is right, WHO or ADA? Diabetes 1998; 47: A150.
20. 20 Jarrett RJ, Keen H, Fuller JH, McCartney M. Worsening to diabetes in men with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetologia 1979; 16: 25-30.
21. 21 Keen H, Jarrett RJ, McCartney M. The ten-year follow-up of the Bedford survey (1962-1972): glucose tolerance and diabetes Diabetologia 1982; 22: 73-78.
22. 22 Albertí KGMM, Zimmet PZ. New diagnostic criteria and classification of diabetes - again? Diabetic Med 1998; 15: 535-536.