Male-female interactions and socio-sexual isolation of Mus spicilegus toward two other species of east-European mice, M. macedonicus and M. m. musculus;Interactions male-femelle et isolement socio-sexual de Mus specilegus vis-a-vis de deux autres especes de souris est-europeennes, M. macedonicus et M. m. musculus

Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences - Serie III

Volumn 322, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 597-605

  Ivantcheva, Aglika ^a   Cassaing, Jacques ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Behavioural interactions; Dyadic encounters; Mus macedonicus; Mus musculus; Mus spicilegus; Socio sexual isolation; Wild mice

Indexed keywords

INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; RODENT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ESTRUS; FEMALE; MALE; MATING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALIA; MUS MACEDONICUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS SPICILEGUS; MUSCULUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 0032758478     PISSN: 07644469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0764-4469(00)88530-3     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bush L. Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;285-288.
2. Dobzhansky T. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. 1970;Columbia University Press, New York.
3. Liou L.W., Price T.D. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution. 48:1994;1451-1459.
4. Mayr E. Systematics and the Origin of Species. 1942;Columbia University Press, New York.
5. Nevo E., Heth G., Auffray J.C., Beiles A. Preliminary studies of sex pheromones in the urine of actively speciating subterranean mole rats of the Spalax ehrenbergi superspecies in Israel. Phytoparasitica. 15:1987;163-164.
6. Paterson H.E.H. Perspective on speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr. J. Sci. 78:1982;53-57.
7. Spencer H.G., McArdle B.H., Lambert D.M. A theoretical investigation of speciation by reinforcement. Am. Nat. 128:1986;241-262.
8. Heth G., Frankenberg E., Raz A., Nevo E. Vibrational communication in subterranean mole rats (Spalax ehrenbergi). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21:1986;31-33.
9. Pillay N., Willan K., Cooke J. Evidence of pre-mating reproductive isolation in two populations of the vlei rat Otomys irroratus: experiments of intra- and inter-population male-female encounters. Z. Säugetierkunde. 60:1995;352-360.
10. West-Eberhardt M.J. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:1983;155-183.
11. Butlin R.K., Ritchie M.G. Behaviour and speciation. Slater P.J.B, Halliday T.R. Behaviour and Evolution. 1994;43-79 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Eldredge N. Species, selection, and Paterson's concept of the specific mate-recognition system. Lambert D.M, Spencer H.G. Speciation and the Recognition Concept. 1995;464-477 Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
13. Paterson H.E.H. The recognition concept of species. Vrba E.S. Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph no. 4, Pretoria. 1985;21-30.
14. Walter G.H. Species concepts and the nature of ecological generalizations about diversity. Lambert D.M, Spencer H.G. Speciation and the Recognition Concept. 1995;191-224 Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
15. Boursot P., Auffray J.C., Britton-Davidian J., Bonhomme F. The evolution of the house mouse. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:1993;119-152.
16. Orsini P. Facteurs régissant la répartition des souris en Europe : intérêt du modèle souris pour une approche des processus évolutifs. thèse. 1982;université Montpellier-II.
17. Garza J.C., Dallas J., Duryadi D., Gerasimov S., Croset H., Boursot P. Social structure of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus revealed by genetic analysis with microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 6:1997;278-281.
18. Duriady D. Rôle possible du comportement dans l'évolution de deux souris Mus macedonicus et Mus spicilegus en Europe centrale. thèse. 1993;université Montpellier-II.
19. Orsini P., Bonhomme F., Britton-Davidian J., Croset H., Gerasimov S., Thaler L. Le complexe d'espèces du genre Mus en Europe centrale et orientale. II. Critères d'identification, répartition et caractéristiques écologiques. Z. Säugetierkunde. 48:1983;86-95.
20. Orth A., Lyapunova E., Kandorov A., Boissinot S., Boursot P., Vorontsov N., Bonhomme F. L'espèce polytypique Mus musculus en Transcaucasie. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. III. 319:1996;435-441.
21. Petrov B., Ruzic A. Taxonomy and distribution of members of the genus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) in Yugoslavia. Proc. Fauna S. R. Serbia. 3:1985;209-243.
22. Gerasimov S., Nikolov H., Mihailova V., Auffray J.C., Bonhomme F. Morphometric stepwise discriminant analysis of five genetically determined European taxa of genus Mus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41:1990;47-64.
23. Bonhomme F., Catalan J., Britton-Davidian J., Chapman V.M., Moriwaki D., Nevo E., Thaler L. Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus. Biochem. Genet. 22:1984;275-303.
24. She J.X., Bonhomme F., Boursot P., Thaler L., Catzeflis F. Molecular phylogenies in the genus Mus: comparative analysis of electrophoretic, scnDNA hybridization and mtDNA RFLP data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41:1990;83-103.
25. Sage R.D. Wild mice. Foster H.L, Small J.D, Fox J.G. The Mouse in Biomedical Research. 1981;39-90 Academic Press, New York.
26. Ivantcheva A., Cassaing J. Divergence comportementale et isolement sexuel des souris est-européennes Mus macedonicus et Mus musculus (sous-espèce musculus). Mammalia. 60:1996;335-349.
27. Livoreil B., Gouat P., Baudoin C. A comparative study of social behaviour of two sympatric ground squirrels (Spermophilus spilosoma, S. mexicanus). Ethology. 93:1993;236-246.
28. Grant E., Mackintosh J. A comparison of the social postures of some laboratory rodents. Behaviour. 21:1963;246-259.
29. Eisenberg J.F. A comparative study in rodent ethology with emphasis on evolution of social behaviour. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 122:1967;1-51.
30. Rice W.R., Hostert E.E. Laboratory experiment on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution. 47:1993;1637-1653.
31. Butlin R.K., Tregenza T. Is speciation no accident? Nature. 387:1997;551-553.
32. Butlin R.K. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Otte D, Endler J.A. Speciation and its Consequences. 1989;158-179 Sinauer, Sunderland.
33. White C.S., Lambert D.M., Foster S.P. Chemical signals and the recognition concept. Lambert D.M, Spencer H.G. Speciation and the Recognition Concept. 1995;301-326 Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.