The common language of space: A way of looking at the social, economic and environmental functioning of cities on a common basis

Journal of Environmental Sciences

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 344-349

  Hillier, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

London; Space syntax; Urban system

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032758373     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Croxford B, Penn A, Hillier B, 1996. Science of the Total Environment, 189/190:3-9
2. Hillier B, 1987. Architecture & Behaviour, 3(3):233-250
3. Hillier B, 1993. Environment & Planning B: Planning and Design, 19:29-66
4. Hillier B, 1996. Space is the machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 470(PB1998)
5. Hillier B, Desyllas J, Greene M, 1999. Self generated neighborhoods: the role of urban form in the consolidation of informal settlements. Proceedings of the second international space syntax symposium. Brasilia. 3
6. Hillier B, 1999. Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Proceedings of the second international space syntax symposium. Brasilia. 3
7. Hillier B, Shea S, 1999. Burglars don't seem to understand defensible space, Planning in London. 29, April. 36-8
8. Penn A, 1998. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 25:59-84
9. Peponis J, 1989. Ekistics(Spacial issue on space syntax). 334/335:43-55
10. Read S, 1997. Space syntax and the Dutch city, Proceeding of the first international space syntax symposium. London: Space Syntax Laboratory, University College London. Vol. 1. 02:1-13