Effects of body position and exercise on evoked response signal for automatic threshold activation

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1476-1480

  Schuchert, Andreas ^a   Ventura, Rodolfo ^a   Meinertz, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Autocapture; Evoked response; Polarization; VVIR pacemaker

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; AUTOANALYZER; BODY POSITION; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPLETE HEART BLOCK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART CONDUCTION; HUMAN; MALE; PACEMAKER ELECTRODE;

EID: 0032757591     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00351.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Clarke M, Liu B, Schüller H, et al. Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: a multicenter study. PACE 1998; 21:1567-1575.
2. Preston TA, Fletcher RD, Lucchesi BR, et al. Changes of the myocardial threshold. Physiologic and pharmacologic factors in patients with implanted pacemakers. Am Heart J 1967; 74:235-242.
3. Sowton E, Barr I. Physiological changes in threshold. Ann NY Acad Sci 1969; 167:679-685.
4. Schuchert A, Kuck K-H, Bleifeld W. Stability of pacing threshold, impedance, and R wave amplitude at rest and during exercise. PACE 1990; 13:1602-1608.
5. Richards AF, Norman J. Relation between QT interval and heart rate. New design of physiologically adaptive cardiac pacemaker. Br Heart J 1981; 45:56-61.
6. Callaghan F, Vollmann W, Livingston A, et al. The ventricular depolarization gradient: Effects of exercise, pacing rate, epinephrine, and intrinsic heart rate control on the right ventricular evoked response. PACE 1989; 12:1115-1130.
7. Singer I, Olash J, Brennan F, et al. Initial clinical experience with a rate responsive pacemaker. PACE 1989; 12:1458-1464.
8. Riddell F, Biosa R, Richardson V. How effective is autocapture? - Clinical experience with Regency SR+ 2400L pacemaker and 1450T lead; (abstract) PACE 1998; 21:955.
9. Sermasi S, Marcon M, Moracchini PV, et al. An Italian experience with the Autocapture function: clinical results in a mid follow-up. (abstract) PACE 1997; 20:1228.
10. Cercas A, Gascon D, Leal J, et al. Evaluation of autocapture algorithm. (abstract) PACE 1997; 20: 1189.
11. Lau C. Initial multi-centered North American experience with the autocapture pacing system. (abstract) PACE 1997; 20:1172.
12. Greenberg S, Crossley G, Ellenbogen K, et al. Clinical experience with the evoked response and polarization testing in the Microny/Regency SR+ pacemakers: Clinical efficacy of autocapture, (abstract) PACE 1997; 20:1172.
13. Kacet S, Jarw M, Klug D. Evaluation of the compatibility of various bipolar pacing leads with autocapture. (abstract) PACE 1998; 21:825.
14. Lau C, Nishimura SC, Philippon F, et al. Polarization signal and evoked response characteristics in current endocardial electrodes. (abstract) PACE 1998; 21:841.