Genotype-environment interaction in maize landraces from northern Spain

Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 177-181

  Alvarez, A ^a   Ruiz De Galarreta, J I ^b  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

^b NEIKER and a Vaccine producing Commercial Company CZVSL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adaptation; AMMI model; Genotype environment interaction; Landraces; Maize

Indexed keywords

GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; LANDRACE; MAIZE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; SPAIN;

EID: 0032755614     PISSN: 03949257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ALVAREZ, A., 1988. Evaluación de poblaciones de maíz grano (Zea mays L.) de la Cornisa Cantábrica y estudio de sus relaciones. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Barcelona.
2. ALVAREZ, A., GIMÉNEZ, J., GARAY, G. and RUIZ DE GALARRETA, J.I., 1993. Evaluación agronómica de variedades locales de maíz de Guipúzcoa. Sustrai, 30: 23-27.
3. ALVAREZ, A. and RUIZ DE GALARRETA, J.I., 1995. Variedades locales de maíz de Gipuzkoa: evaluación y clasificación. Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (ed.). San Sebastián. 80 p.
4. ANNICCHIARICO, P., BERTOLINI, M. and MAZZINELLI, G., 1995. Analysis of genotype environment interactions for maize hybrids in Italy. J. Genet. & Breed., 49: 61-67.
5. CECCARELLI, S., 1989. Wide adaptation: How wide?. Euphytica, 40: 197-205.
6. COCHRAN, W.G. and COX, G.M., 1957. Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
7. ELINGS, A., 1993. Durum wheat landraces from Syria. III. Agronomic performance in relation to collection regions and landrace groups. Euphytica, 70: 85-96.
8. ELINGS, A. and NACHIT, M.M., 1991. Durum wheat landraces from Syria. I. Agro-ecological and morphological characterization. Euphytica, 53: 211-224.
9. GAUCH, H.G., 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
10. GOLLOB, H.F., 1968. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika, 33: 367-376.
11. HEBERT, Y., PLOMION, C. and HARZIC, N., 1995. Genotype x environment interaction for root traits in maize, as analysed with factorial regression models. Euphytica, 81: 85-92.
12. LIN, C.S. and BINNS, M.R., 1988. A method of analyzing cultivar x location x year experiments: a new stability parameter. Theor. Appl Genet., 76: 425-430.
13. ROMAGOSA, I., FOX, P.N., GARCÍA DEL MORAL, L.F., RAMOS, J.M., GARCÍA DEL MORAL, B., ROCA DE TOGORES, B. and MOLINA-CANO, J.L., 1993. Integration of statistical and physiological analyses of adaptation of near-isogenic barley lines. Theor. Appl. Genet., 86: 822-826.
14. RUIZ DE GALARRETA, J.I. and ALVAREZ, A, 1990. Guipuzcoan populations of maize. I. Morphological evaluation and correlation between quantitative traits. Ann. Aula Dei, 20: 27-39.
15. SNELLER, C.H. and DOMBECK, D., 1995. Comparing soybean cultivar ranking and selection for yield with AMMI and full-data performance estimates. Crop Sci., 35: 1536-1541.
16. VAN OOSTEROM, E.J., KLEIJN, D., CECCARELLI, S. and NACHIT, M.M., 1993. Genotype-by-environment interactions of barley in the Mediterranean region. Crop Sci., 33: 669-674.
17. WALLACE, D.H., BAUDOIN, J.P., BEAVER, J., COYNE, D.P., HALSETH, D.E., MASAYA, P.N., MUNGER, H.M., MYERS, J.R., SILBERNAGEL, M., YOURSTONE, K.S. and ZOBEL, R.W., 1993. Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theor. Appl. Genet., 86: 27-40.
18. WESTCOTT, B., 1986. Some methods of analysing genotype x environment interaction. Heredity, 56: 243-253.
19. ZOBEL, R.W., WRIGHT, M.J. and GAUCH, G., 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J., 80: 388-393.