Validation of a photosynthesis model through the use of the CO2 balance of a greenhouse tomato canopy

Annals of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 591-598

  Zekki, H ^a   Gary, C ^b   Gosselin, A ^a   Gauthier, L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN IMMUNOLOGY AND CANCER   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acock's model; CO2 balance; Greenhouse; Photosynthesis; Residuals; Tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill; TOMGRO model

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0032755291     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1999.0938     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Acock B. 1991. Modeling canopy photosynthesis response to carbon dioxide, light interception, temperature and leaf traits. In: Modeling crop photosynthesis - from biochemistry to canopy. CSSA Special publication no. 19 CSSA, Madison, WI, USA.
2. Acock B, Charles-Edwards DA, Fitter DJ, Hand DW, Ludwig LJ, Warren-Wilson J, Withers AC. 1978. The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop net photosynthesis: an experimental examination of two canopy models. Journal of Experimental Botany 29: 815-827.
3. Anscombe FJ, Tuckey, JW. 1963. The examination and analysis of residual. Technometrics 5: 141-160.
4. Bertin N, Heuvelink E. 1993. Dry-matter production in tomato crop: comparison of two simulation models. Journal of Horticultural Science 68: 995-1011.
5. Dayan E, Van Keulen H, Jones JW, Zipori I, Shmueli D, Challa H. 1993. Development, calibration and validation of a greenhouse tomato growth model: I. Description of the model. Agricultural Systems 43: 145-163.
6. Drapper NR, Smith H. 1966. Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley.
7. Emerson JD, Stoto MA. 1983. Transformating data. In: Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Tuckey, JH, eds. Understanding robust and explanatory data analysis. New York: Wiley, 96-126.
8. Farquhar GD, Ehlinger JR, Hubick KT. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 503-537.
9. Fernandez GJ. 1992. Residual analysis and data transformations: Important tools in statistical analysis. HortScience 27: 297-300.
10. Finney DJ. 1989. Was this in your statistical text book? V. Transformation of data. Experimental Agriculture 25: 165-175.
11. Gary C, Jones JW, Longuenesse JJ. 1991. Modelling daily changes in specific leaf area of tomato: the contribution of the leaf assimilate pool. Acta Horticulturae 328: 205-210.
12. Gosiewski W, Nilwik HJM, Bierhuizen JF. 1982. The influence of temperature on photosynthesis of different tomato genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae 16: 109-115.
13. 2 and production. Life Sciences 86: 107-122.
14. Halfon E. 1983. Is there a best model structure? II. Comparing the model structures of different fate models. Ecological Modelling 20: 153-163.
15. Halfon E. 1985a. Regression method in ecotoxicology. A better formulation using the geometric mean functional regression. Environmental Science and Technology 19: 747-749.
16. Halfon E. 1985b. Is there a best model structure? III. Testing the goodness of fit. Ecological Modelling 27: 15-23.
17. Halfon E. 1989. Probabilistic validation of computer simulations using the bootstrap. Ecological Modelling 46: 213-219.
18. Hand DW, Clark G, Hannah MA, Thornley JHM, Warren Wilson J. 1992. Measuring the canopy net photosynthesis of glasshouse crops. Journal of Experimental Botany 43: 375-381.
19. Himmelblau DM. 1968. Process analysis by statistical methods. New York: Wiley.
20. Ho LC. 1992. Fruit growth and sink strength, in fruit and seed production. In: Marshall C, Grace J, eds. Aspects of development, environmental physiology and ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101-124.
21. 2 concentrations. I. Physiological aspects. Annals of Botany 38: 375-388.
22. Hurd RG, Gay AP, Moutifield AC. 1979. The effect of partial flower removal on the relation between root, shoot and fruit growth in the indeterminate tomato. Annals of Applied Biology 14: 316-325.
23. Jones JW, Dayan E, Allen LH, Van Keulan H, Challa H. 1991. A dynamic tomato growth and yield model. Transactions of the ASAE 34(2): 663-672.
24. Lake JV. 1966. Measurement and control of the rate of carbon dioxide assimilation by glasshouse crops. Nature 209: 97-98.
25. Marquardt DM. 1963. An algorithm for least square estimation on nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society of Industrial Applied Mathematics 11: 431-441.
26. Matthews RB, Marshall B, Saffell RA, Harris D. 1987. Computer control of carbon dioxide concentration in experimental glasshouses and its use to estimate net canopy photosynthesis. Agricultural Forum of Meteorology 40: 279-292.
27. Mihailov I. 1975. A study on the number of ovules per fruit set in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) hybrid combinations and the corresponding parent cultivars. Comptes Rendus l'Academie Agricole Georgi Dimitrov 8: 45-57.
28. 2 on photosynthesis, transpiration and production of greenhouse fruit vegetable crops. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University.
29. Pachepsky LB, Haskett JD, Acock B. 1996. An adequate model of photosynthesis - I Parametrization, validation and comparison of models. Agricultural Systems 50: 209-225.
30. 2 measurement and control. In: Enoch HZ, Kimball BA, eds. Carbon dioxide enrichment of greenhouse crops. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC PRESS.
31. Penning de Vries FWT, Van Laar HH, Chardon MCM. 1983. Bioenergetics of the growth of seeds, fruits and storage organs. In: Potential productivity of field crops under different environments. International Rice Research Institute: Manila, Philippines, 15-33.
32. Quenouille M. 1949. Approximate tests of correlations in time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 111: 18-84.
33. SPSS. 1997. SPSS advanced statistics. SPSS Inc. USA.
34. Starck Z. 1983. Photosynthesis and endogenous regulation of the source-sink relation in tomato plants. Photosynthetica 17: 1-11.
35. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Swed FS, Eisenhart C. 1943. Tables for testing randomness of grouping in a sequence of alternatives. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 14: 66-87.
37. Tanaka A, Fujita K, Shioya M. 1974. Nutrio-physiological studies on the tomato plant. II. Translocation of photosynthesis. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 20: 163-171.
38. Teisser G. 1948. La relation d'allometrie: sa significance statistique et biologique. Biometrics 4: 14-48.