Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring

Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 623-639

  Boehm, F H ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; APGAR SCORE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FETUS; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETRY; REVIEW;

EID: 0032752517     PISSN: 08898545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70103-0     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fetal distress and birth asphyxia. ACOG committee opinion no. 137 1994 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washington, DC
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Inappropriate use of the terms fetal distress and birth asphyxia. ACOG committee opinion no. 197 1998 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washington, DC
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. ACOG technical bulletin no. 132 1989 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washington, DC
4. H.D. Banta S.B. Thacker Costs and benefits to electronic fetal monitoring: A review of the literature. Report No. DHEW-PHS-79-3245 1979 National Center for Health Services Research Rockville, MD
5. F.H. Boehm L.M. Fields J.M. Hutchison The indirectly obtained fetal heart rate: Comparison of first- and second-generation electronic fetal monitors Am J Obstet Gynecol 155 1986 10 14
6. B. Carbonne B. Langer F. Goffinet Multicenter study on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry. II. Compared predictive values of pulse oximetry and fetal blood analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 1997 593 598
7. S.L. Clark M.L. Gimovsky F.C. Miller Fetal heart rate response to scalp blood sampling Am J Obstet Gynecol 144 1982 706 708
8. S.L. Clark M.L. Gimovsky F.C. Miller The scalp stimulation test: A clinical alternative to fetal scalp blood sampling Am J Obstet Gynecol 148 1984 274 277
9. Dellinger EH, Boehm FH. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Normal, fetal stress, and fetal distress and early neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol, in press
10. G.A. Dildy S.L. Clark C.A. Loucks Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: Past, present, and future Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 1996 1 9
11. G.A. Dildy J.A. Thorp J.D. Yeast The relationship between oxygen saturation and pH in umbilical blood: Implications for intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation monitoring Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 1996 682 687
12. Dildy G.A. van den Berg P.P. M. Katz Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: Fetal oxygen saturation trends during labor and relation to delivery outcome Am J Obstet Gynecol 171 1994 679 684
13. P.T. Edington J. Sibanda R.W. Beard Influence on clinical practice of routine intrapartum fetal monitoring BMJ 3 1975 341 343
14. A. Elimian R. Figueroa N. Tejani Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: A comparison of scalp stimulation with scalp blood pH sampling Obstet Gynecol 89 1997 373 376
15. P.H. Ellison M. Foster M. Sheridan-Pereira Electronic fetal heart monitoring, auscultation, and neonatal outcome Am J Obstet Gynecol 164 1991 1281 1289
16. Guidelines for Perinatal Care ed 4 1997 American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Elk Grove Village, IL, and Washington, DC
17. A.D. Haverkamp M. Orleans S. Langendoerfer A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring Am J Obstet Gynecol 134 1979 399 412
18. A.D. Haverkamp H.E. Thompson J.G. McFee The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high risk pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 125 1976 310 320
19. E. Hochuli “Fetales monitoring” in Rahmen der aktuellen Geburtshiflichen Intensivuberwachung Schweiz Med Wochenschr 106 1976 841 846
20. F.D. Johnstone D.M. Campbell G.J. Hughes Antenatal care: Has continuous intrapartum monitoring made any impact on fetal outcome? Lancet 1978 1298 1300
21. I.M. Kelso R.J. Parsons G.F. Lawrence An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 131 1978 526 532
22. K.S. Koh D. Creves S. Yung Experience with fetal monitoring in a university teaching hospital Can Med Assoc J 112 1975 455 456
23. M. Kühnert B. Seelbach-Göebel M. Butterwegge Predictive agreement between the fetal arterial oxygen saturation and fetal scalp pH: Results of the German multicenter study Am J Obstet Gynecol 178 1998 330 335
24. W.K. Lee M.S. Baggish The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring Obstet Gynecol 47 1976 516 520
25. W.D. Lehmann G.K. Newmann K.F. Kessler Operationshaufgkeit und perinatale Sterblichkeit vor und nach Emfuhrung der fatalen Blutgosanalyse under der Kontinuierlichen Uberwachung der fetalen Herzfrequenz Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 36 1976 247 255
26. D.A. Luthy K.K. Shy Van Belle G. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor Obstet Gynecol 69 1987 687 695
27. A.K. Luttkus W. Friedmann S. Thomas The safety of fetal pulse oximetry in parturients requiring fetal scalp blood sampling Obstet Gynecol 90 1997 533 537
28. D. MacDonald A. Grant M. Sheridan-Pereira The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring Am J Obstet Gynecol 152 1985 524 539
29. J.C. Morrison B.F. Chez I.D. Davis Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: Monitoring by auscultation or electronic means Am J Obstet Gynecol 168 1993 63 66
30. R.E. Myers Two patterns of perinatal brain damage and their conditions of occurrence Am J Obstet Gynecol 112 1972 246
31. National Center for Health Statistics Annual summary of birth, marriages, divorces, and deaths: United States, 1992 Month Vital Stat Rep 41 1993 28
32. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Research guidelines for interpretation Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 1997 1385 1390
33. S. Neldam M. Osler Kern Hansen P. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in a combined low- and high-risk population: A controlled clinical trial Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 23 1986 1 11
34. P. Renou A. Chang I. Anderson Controlled trial of fetal intensive care Am J Obstet Gynecol 126 1976 470 476
35. E. Saling A new method for examination of the child during labor: Introduction, technique, and principles Arch Gynecol 197 1962 108 122
36. L. Shenker R.C. Post J.S. Seiler Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart and uterine activity during labour Obstet Gynecol 46 1975 185 189
37. P.H. Shiono D. McNellis G.G. Rhoads Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates, 1978–1984 Obstet Gynecol 69 1987 696 700
38. N. Tejani L. Mann A. Bhakthavathsalan Correlation of fetal heart rate–uterine contraction patterns and fetal scalp blood pH Obstet Gynecol 46 1975 392 396
39. S.B. Thacker D.F. Stroup H.B. Peterson Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: An update Obstet Gynecol 86 1995 613 620
40. US Department of Health and Human Services Prenatal and Perinatal Factors Associated with Brain Disorders—United States 1985 NIH publication Bethesda MD no. 85–1149
41. US Department of Health and Human Services Rates of cesarean delivery—United States MMWR 41 1991 285 289
42. A.M. Vintzileos A. Antsaklis I. Varvarigos A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation Obstet Gynecol 81 1993 899 907
43. A.M. Vintzileos D.J. Nochimson E.R. Guzman Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: A meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 85 1995 149 155
44. Z. Weinraub E. Casp I. Brook Perinatal outcome in monitored and unmonitored high-risk deliveries Isr Med Sci 14 1978 249 255
45. C. Wood P. Renou J. Oats A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low risk obstetric population Am J Obstet Gynecol 141 1981 527 534
46. B.K. Young A guest editorial: Monitoring the fetal heart: A continuing controversy Obstet Gynecol Surv 50 1995 699 700