The determinants of growth of employment subcenters

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 189-201

  Giuliano, Genevieve ^a,b   A Small, Kenneth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN ECONOMY; URBAN GROWTH;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032751120     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(98)00043-X     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Blair J.P., Premus R. Major factors in industrial location: A Review. Economic Development Quarterly. 1:1987;72-85.
2. Boarnet M.G. An empirical model of intrametropolitan population and employment growth. Papers in Regional Science. 73:1994;135-152.
3. Bradbury, K.L., Downs, A., Small, K.A., 1982. Urban Decline and the Future of American Cities, Brookings Institution,Washington, DC.
4. Cervero, R., 1989. America's suburban centers: The land use - transportation link, Unwin Hyman, Boston.
5. Cervero, R., Wu, K.-L., 1996. Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A,forthcoming.
6. Danson, M.W., Lever, W.F., Malcolm, J.F., 1980. The inner city employment problem in Great Britain, 1952-1976: A shift-share approach. Urban Studies 17, 193-210.
7. Doeringer, P.B., Terkla, D.G., Topakian, G.C., 1987. Invisible factors in local economic development. Oxford University Press, New York.
8. Dunphy R.T. Defining regional employment centers in an urban area. Transportation Research Record. 861:1982;13-15.
9. Erickson R.A. Multinucleation in metropolitan economies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 76:1986;331-346.
10. Fotheringham A.S. A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations. Environment and Planning A. 12:1983;15-36.
11. Fujita M., Ogawa H. Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 12:1982;161-196.
12. Giuliano G., Small K.A. Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 21:1991;163-182.
13. Giuliano G., Small K.A. Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Studies. 9:1993;1485-1500.
14. Glaeser E.L., Kallal H.D., Scheinkman J.A., Schleifer A. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy. 100:1992;1126-1152.
15. Gordon P., Richardson H.W. Beyond polycentricity. Journal of the American Planning Association. 62:1996;289-295.
16. Gordon P., Richardson H., Wong H. The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: The case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A. 18A:1986;161-173.
17. Greene D.L. Recent trends in urban spatial structure. Growth and Change. 11:1980;29-40.
18. Griffith D.A. Modelling urban population density in a multi-centered city. Journal of Urban Economics. 9:1981;298-310.
19. Hansen W.G. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 25:1959;73-76.
20. Hartwick P.G., Hartwick J.M. Efficient resource allocation in a multinucleated city with intermediate goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 88:1974;340-352.
21. Heikkila E., Gordon P., Kim J., Peiser R., Richardson H., Dale-Johnson D. What happened to the CBD distance gradient?: Land values in a polycentric city. Environment and Planning A. 21A:1989;221-232.
22. Helsley R.W., Sullivan A.M. Dynamic models of urban subcenter formation. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 21:1991;255-275.
23. Henderson, J.V., 1988. Urban Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Kim T.J. A combined land use-transportation model when zonal travel demand is endogenously determined. Transportation Research. 17B:1983;449-462.
25. Lever, W., Mather, F., 1986. The changing structure of business and employment in the conurbation. In: Lever, W.F., Moore, C. (Eds.), The city in transition: Policies and agencies for the economic regeneration of Clydeside. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-21.
26. McDonald J.F., McMillen D.P. Employment subcenters and land values in a polycentric urban area: The case of Chicago. Environment and Planning A. 22:1990;1561-1574.
27. McMillen, D.P., One hundred fifty years of land values in Chicago: A nonparametric approach. Journal of Urban Economics (forthcoming).
28. Merrifield J. The role of shift-share in regional analysis. Regional Science Perspectives. 13:1983;48-53.
29. Odland J. The conditions for multi-centered cities. Economic Geography. 54:1978;234-245.
30. Palumbo, G., Sacks, S., Wasylenko, M., 1990. Population decentralization within metropolitan areas: 1970-1980. Journal of Urban Economics 27, 151-167.
31. Richardson H.W., Gordon P., Jun M.-J., Heikkila E., Peiser R., Dale-Johnson D. Residential property values, the CBD, and multiple nodes: Further Analysis. Environment and Planning A. 22:1990;829-833.
32. Sasaki K. The establishment of a subcenter and urban spatial structure. Environment and Planning A. 22:1990;369-383.
33. Scott, A.J., 1988. Metropolis: From the division of labor to urban form. University of California Press, Berkeley.
34. Shukla V., Waddell P. Firm location and land use in discrete urban space: A study of the spatial structure of Dallas - Fort Worth. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 21:1991;225-253.
35. Small K.A., Song S. Population and employment densities: Structure and change. Journal of Urban Economics. 36:1994;292-313.
36. Stern D.I. Historical path-dependence of the urban population density gradient. Annals of Regional Science. 28:1994;197-222.
37. Thomas, R.W., Huggett, R.J., 1980. Modelling in Geography: A Mathematical Approach. Harper and Row, London.
38. Vuong Q. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica. 57:1989;307-333.
39. White M.J. Firm suburbanization and urban subcenters. Journal of Urban Economics. 3:1976;323-343.
40. Wieand K.F. An extension of the monocentric urban spatial equilibrium model to a multicenter setting: The case of the two-center city. Journal of Urban Economics. 21:1987;259-271.